Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Longitudinal inconsistency in responses to survey items that ask women about intimate partner violence

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Feb 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vivienne Bachelet
28 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rose Baker
28 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Loxton
Resubmission - Version 2
28 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rose Baker
8 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vivienne Bachelet
24 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Loxton
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Aug 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vivienne Bachelet
5 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Loxton
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Loxton
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Sep 2019 Editorially accepted
29 Oct 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-019-0835-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement