European Medicines Agency Policy 0070: an exploratory review of data utility in clinical study reports for academic research
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Dec 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jim Slattery|
|14 Feb 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Doshi|
|20 Mar 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Jean-Marc Ferran|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Mar 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Doshi|
|12 Sep 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Jean-Marc Ferran|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Sep 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Sep 2019||Editorially accepted|
|5 Nov 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12874-019-0836-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.