Skip to main content

Table 4 Meta-analysed effects of healthy ageing and self-rated health on incident dependence, controlling sequentially for sociodemographic and health conditions

From: Healthy ageing and the prediction of mortality and incidence dependence in low- and middle- income countries: a 10/66 population-based cohort study

Incident dependence sub-HR (95% CI)

Healthy Ageing

Q1 quintile

Q2 quintile

Q3 quintile

Q4 quintile

Q5 quintile

 Model 1

10.61 (8.38–13.43)

4.38 (3.42–5.61)

2.85 (2.20–3.68)

1.86 (1.42–2.45)

reference

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.468

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.696

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.663

0.0%, p = 0.670

 Model 2

7.76 (6.04–9.97)

3.63 (2.80–4.70)

2.52 (1.94–3.27)

1.72 (1.30–2.27)

reference

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.949

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.915

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.904

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.830

 Model 3

5.21 (4.02–6.75)

3.53 (2.71–4.59)

2.60 (2.00–3.35)

1.74 (1.32–2.29)

reference

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.735

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.819

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.889

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.799

Self-rated health

very low

low

moderate

good

very good

 Model 1

2.18 (1.30–3.64)

2.33 (1.84–2.94)

1.54 (1.30–1.83)

1.14 (0.96–1.35)

reference

I2 = 47.4%, p = 0.107

I2 = 65.1%, p = 0.014

I2 = 54.6%, p = 0.051

I2 = 24.1%, p = 0.253

 Model 2

1.77 (0.99–3.18)

2.03 (1.60–2.57)

1.37 (1.15–1.62)

1.02 (0.85–1.22)

reference

I2 = 1.3%, p = 0.399

I2 = 54.6%, p = 0.051

I2 = 59.2%, p = 0.031

I2 = 39.6%, p = 0.141

 Model 3

1.51 (0.77–2.94)

1.70 (1.29–2.24)

1.29 (1.07–1.55)

1.01 (0.84–1.21)

reference

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.529

I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.616

I2 = 19.7%, p = 0.285

I2 = 4.1%, p = 0.390

  1. sub-HR sub-hazard rates of competing risk analysis, CI confidence intervals, Q1: lowest level of healthy ageing; Q5: highest level of healthy ageing; Model 1: no adjustments; Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, education level, number of assets; Model 3: Model 2 + physical impairments, stroke, depression, dementia