Table 3 OAKS collaborator survey responses, centre activity and data completeness at one-year postoperatively
Respondent at a centre with ≥95% completeness | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes (n = 141) | No (n = 111) | p-value | ||
Stage of Training | Junior Doctor | 47 (56.6) | 36 (43.4) | 0.929 |
Later Year Student | 52 (56.5) | 40 (43.5) | ||
Early Year Student | 41 (53.9) | 35 (46.1) | ||
Previous participation in initial phase of OAKS data collection | Yes | 66 (56.4) | 51 (43.6) | 0.850 |
No | 74 (55.2) | 60 (44.8) | ||
Prior experience with audit | Yes | 65 (60.2) | 43 (39.8) | 0.222 |
No | 75 (52.4) | 68 (47.6) | ||
Rating of experience identifying consultant | Positive (4–5) | 91 (58.7) | 64 (41.3) | 0.235 |
Not Positive (< 4) | 49 (51.0) | 47 (49.0) | ||
Rating of experience registering audit a | Positive (4–5) | 67 (56.8) | 51 (43.2) | 0.763 |
Not Positive (< 4) | 73 (54.9) | 60 (45.1) | ||
Rating of experience linking Patient ID a | Positive (4–5) | 96 (71.6) | 38 (28.4) | < 0.001 |
Not Positive (< 4) | 44 (37.6) | 73 (62.4) | ||
Rating of experience collecting data a | Positive (4–5) | 106 (59.2) | 73 (40.8) | 0.104 |
Not Positive (< 4) | 34 (47.9) | 37 (52.1) | ||