True and false positive rates for different criteria of evaluating statistical evidence from clinical trials
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Aug 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Sep 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Don van Ravenzwaaij|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Sep 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Oct 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leonhard Held|
|8 Oct 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Colquhoun|
|5 Nov 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Don van Ravenzwaaij|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Nov 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Nov 2019||Editorially accepted|
|27 Nov 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12874-019-0865-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.