Analysis of reporting completeness in exercise cancer trials: a systematic review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Jul 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Aug 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sebastian Voigt-Radloff|
|1 Sep 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sascha Köpke|
|4 Sep 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ralph Moehler|
|7 Oct 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Jose F Meneses-Echavez|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Oct 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Oct 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sebastian Voigt-Radloff|
|7 Nov 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Jose F Meneses-Echavez|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Nov 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Nov 2019||Editorially accepted|
|2 Dec 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12874-019-0871-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.