Table 3 Completeness of reporting of by exercise modality: aerobic exercise; aerobic exercise plus resistance training; resistance training
From: Analysis of reporting completeness in exercise cancer trials: a systematic review
TIDieR item | Aerobic exercise (n = 43) | Aerobic exercise plus resistance training (n = 40) | Resistance training (n = 18) |
|---|---|---|---|
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |
Item 1. Brief name | 31 (72.1%) | 18 (45%) | 10 (55.6%) |
Item 2. Why | 40 (93%) | 37 (92.5%) | 18 (100%) |
Item 3. What (materials) | 29 (67.4%) | 17 (42.5%) | 11 (61.1%) |
Item 4. What (procedures) | 34 (79.1%) | 29 (72.5%) | 16 (88.9%) |
Item 5a. Who provided (disciplinary background) | 32 (74.4%) | 20 (50%) | 10 (55.6%) |
Item 5b. Who provided (expertise. experience. or specific training) | 17 (39.5%) | 12 (30%) | 5 (27.8%) |
Item 6. How | 31 (72.1%) | 26 (65%) | 13 (72.2%) |
Item 7. Where | 35 (81.4%) | 23 (57.5%) | 10 (55.6%) |
Item 8a. Frequency | 40 (93%) | 36 (90%) | 18 (100%) |
Item 8b. Length | 40 (93%) | 38 (95%) | 18 (100%) |
Item 8c. Duration | 37 (86%) | 32 (80%) | 16 (88.9%) |
Item 8d. Intensity | 35 (81.4%) | 34 (85%) | 14 (77.8%) |
Item 9. Tailoring | 29 (67.4%) | 23 (57.5%) | 14 (77.8%) |
Item 10. Modifications | 15 (34.9%) | 21 (53.8%) | 15 (83.3%) |
Item 11. How well (planned) | 20 (46.5%) | 18 (46.2%) | 10 (55.6%) |
Item 12. How well (actual) | 24 (55.8%) | 15 (39.5%) | 12 (66.7%) |