Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of participants in both waves to those who participated only in Wave 1

From: Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France

 

Total

N = 190

Lost to follow-up N = 67

Waves

1 & 2 N = 123

OR

CI

p-value

N/m

%/sd

N/m

%/sd

N/m

%/sd

Socio-demographics

 Female Gender

115

60.5

40

59.7

75

61.0

0.95

[0.85–1.74]

0.864

 Age at time of terrorist attack:

mean

41.8

13.6

38.8

14.3

43.5

12.9

   

min-max

19–84

19–84

23–79

   

   [18–30]

49

25.8

26

38.8

23

18.7

ref

 

0.007

   [31–50]

94

49.5

30

44.8

64

52.0

0.41

[0.20–0.84]

   ≥ 51

47

24.7

11

16.4

36

29.2

0.27

[0.11–0.65]

 Educational Level < high-school diploma

57

30.2

24

35.8

33

27.0

0.66

[0.35–1.26]

0.210

 Unemployed

34

17.9

14

20.9

20

16.3

1.36

[0.64–2.91]

0.427

 Living alone

46

24.2

10

14.9

36

29.3

0.42

[0.20–0.92]

0.030

 Non-French origin

13

6.8

8

11.9

5

4.1

3.20

[1.01–10.21]

0.049

Terror exposure

 Event location outside of Paris (vs Paris)

131

68.9

39

58.2

92

74.8

2.13

[1.13–4.01]

0.019

 Geographic exposure:

Less than 10 m

20

10.5

6

9.0

14

11.4

1.39

[0.32–6.08]

0.639

Very close, next room

64

33.7

23

34.3

41

33.3

1.82

[0.53–6.25]

Neighbouring building

89

46.8

34

50.7

55

44.7

2.01

[0.61–6.67]

Elsewhere

17

8.9

4

6.0

13

10.6

ref

 

 Objective exposure:

Directly threatened

58

30.5

22

32.8

36

29.3

0.86

[0.37–2.00]

0.516

Indirectly threatened

82

43.2

27

40.3

55

44.7

0.38

[0.09–1.61]

Close relative of victims

14

7.4

3

4.5

11

8.9

0.69

[0.31–1.54]

Witness

36

18.9

15

22.4

21

17.1

ref

 

 Perceived terror exposure (0–10)

6.3

3.0

6.1

3.1

6.4

3.0

0.97

[0.88–1.07]

0.518

Peri-traumatic reactions

 PDEQ (0–40)

15.5

10.5

14.2

10.8

16.2

10.3

0.98

[0.95–1.01]

0.226

 STRS (0–52)

22.5

11.6

20.9

12.9

23.4

10.9

0.98

[0.96–1.01]

0.170

Sheehan disability scale

 Work (impact ≥4)

83

45.1

19

28.8

64

54.2

0.34

[0.18–0.65]

0.001

 Social life (impact ≥4)

75

39.5

22

32.8

53

43.1

0.65

[0.35–1.20]

0.168

 Family life, home responsibilities (impact ≥4)

66

34.7

23

34.3

43

35.0

0.97

[0.52–1.82]

0.930

Psychological support

 No psychological support (after 48 h, 1w, or > 1w)

46

24.2

22

32.8

24

19.5

2.00

[1.01–3.93]

0.046

 No regular psychological follow-up after attack

144

76.2

55

83.3

89

72.4

1.91

[0.89–4.08]

0.094

 Dissatisfaction with psychological support from professionals

56

32.6

22

39.3

34

29.3

1.56

[0.80–3.05]

0.192

Media impact

 Contacted by media regarding the event

116

61.1

40

59.7

76

61.8

0.92

[0.50–1.68]

0.778

 Interviewed by media regarding the event

63

34.8

28

43.8

35

29.9

1.82

[0.97–3.43]

0.063

Social support

 Feeling alone

27

14.2

7

10.4

20

16.3

0.60

[0.24–1.50]

0.277

 No perceived moral/emotional support

2

1.1

1

1.5

1

0.8

1.85

[0.11–30.03]

0.666

 No perceived financial/material support

37

19.5

11

16.4

26

21.1

0.73

[0.34–1.60]

0.434

 No perceived everyday support

20

10.5

6

9.0

14

11.4

0.77

[0.28–2.10]

0.603

Mental health

 PTSD (previous month)

34

17.9

14

20.9

20

16.3

1.36

[0.64–2.91]

0.427

 Major depressive disorder (last two weeks)

20

10.5

7

10.4

13

10.6

0.99

[0.37–2.61]

0.979

 Suicide risk (previous month)

52

27.4

15

22.4

37

30.1

0.67

[0.34–1.34]

0.257

 Anxiety disorders (at least one)

50

26.5

16

23.9

34

27.9

0.91

[0.47–1.73]

0.764

 Moderately/markedly/severely ill (CGI)

55

29.4

17

26.2

38

31.1

0.78

[0.40–1.53]

0.476

  1. IMPACTS survey, France, 2015
  2. N Number, m Mean, sd Standard deviation, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, ref Reference. P-value was two-sided statistical significance level of the logistic regression. P-values in bold were lesser than 0.10