Skip to main content

Table 5 Site-specific accuracy of the best-performing algorithms

From: Validation of an algorithm based on administrative data to detect new onset of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Study sitesSensitivity % (95% CI)Specificity % (95% CI)PPV % (95% CI)NPV % (95% CI)
Panel A – Site-specific accuracy of the algorithm achieving the highest overall PPV (Algorithm 6)
 UHC A61.5 (54.3–68.7)88.9 (85.3–92.4)75.9 (68.8–83.0)80.2 (75.9–84.4)
 UHC B78.7 (72.1–85.2)85.9 (82.2–89.5)70.7 (63.8–77.6)90.3 (87.1–93.5)
Panel B – Site-specific accuracy of the algorithm achieving highest overall sensitivity (Algorithm 5)
 UHC A62.6 (55.5–69.8)87.9 (84.2–91.5)74.6 (67.6–81.7)80.5 (76.2–84.7)
 UHC B79.3 (72.9–85.8)84.4 (80.6–88.3)68.8 (61.9–75.7)90.4 (87.2–93.6)
  1. Abbreviations: CI Confidence interval, PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value