Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of the Telephone and Web Survey Data with the Census Data Regarding Sociodemographic Variables

From: Telephone versus web panel National Survey for monitoring adoption of preventive behaviors to climate change in populations: a case study of Lyme disease in Québec, Canada

Sociodemographic variables

Census

Sample

Chi-square test (χ2) and effect size (Cramer’s V)a

Web

Phone

Web-Census

Telephone-Census

Web-Telephone

χ2

Cramer’s V

χ2

Cramer’s V

χ2

Cramer’s V

Age

 • 18–34

25.6%

11.3%

5.6%

178.76****

0.19††

312.07****

0.25†††

35.66***

0.14

 • 35–44

16.4%

13.9%

14.4%

 • 45–54

18.8%

19.1%

17.7%

 • 55–64

18.6%

27.8%

26.4%

 • 65–74

12.9%

21.3%

24.0%

 • 75 and more

7.7%

6.6%

11.9%

Gender

 • Male

48.5%

44.6%

31.7%

5.97*

0.08

113.40****

0.34††

34.34***

−0.13

 • Female

51.5%

55.4%

68.3%

Household size

 • 1 person

30.5%

25.8%

22.4%

58.32****

0.18

40.25****

0.14

7.69*

0.06

 • 2 persons

34.2%

44.1%

41.7%

 • 3 persons and more

35.3%

30.1%

35.9%

Presence of at least one child in the household

 • Yes

39.2%

28.7%

36.3%

43.53****

0.22

3.54 n.s.

0.06

12.68***

−0.08

 • No

60.8%

71.3%

63.7%

Highest education levelb

 • No certificate, diploma, or degree

17.4%

8.1%

12.1%

165.57****

0.24††

240.86****

0.28††

19.33***

0.10

 • Secondary (high) school diploma or equivalency certificate

23.3%

29.2%

30.2%

 • Diploma or certificate of college, trade, or vocational studies, or partial university studies

39.3%

30.7%

23.1%

 • University degree

20.0%

32.0%

34.6%

Household annual gross incomeb

 • $20,000 and less

9.7%

9.2%

12.2%

6.24n.s.

0.05

10.60*

0.07

13.40**

0.09

 • $20,001–$60,000

37.1%

41.1%

37.6%

 • $60,001–$100,000

26.3%

27.7%

22.7%

 • More than $100,000

26.9%

22.0%

27.5%

  1. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001 ****p < .0001
  2. a Effect size interpretation: Small effect, †† Moderate effect, †††Large effect
  3. b25% census sample