Skip to main content

Table 1 Sample characteristics in two randomized trials of summary format testing

From: Framing the numerical findings of Cochrane plain language summaries: two randomized controlled trials

Trials

Trial 1. Framing

Trial 2. Numerical presentation

Variables

Negative (n = 44)

Positive (n = 47)

Group A (n = 120)

Group B (n = 125)

Biomedical students (%)

44 (100)

47 (100)

52 (44.1)

43 (46.7)

Women (%)

32 (72.2)

33 (70.2)

75 (62.5)

83 (66.4)

Age (Md, IQR)

19 (19.0 to 19.8)

19 (19.0 to 20.0)

28.5 (21.0 to 47.5)

33.0 (22.0 to 55.0)

Education (%):

 Elementary

0

0

1 (0.8)

2 (1.6)

 High school

0

0

22 (18.3)

33 (26.4)

 Currently enrolled in university

44 (100)

47 (100)

55 (45.8)

47 (37.6)

 College graduate

0

0

8 (6.7)

24 (19.2)

 University graduate

0

0

33 (27.5)

19 (19.2)

 PhD

0

0

1 (0.8)

0

Information sources (%)a

 Internet

27 (61.4)

34 (72.3)

90 (75.0)

95 (76.0)

 Family and friends

16 (36.4)

17 (36.2)

39 (32.5)

54 (43.2)

 Books

12 (27.3)

11 (23.4)

48 (40.0)

42 (33.6)

 Family doctor

31 (70.5)

29 (61.7)

78 (65.0)

85 (68.0)

Internet sources (%)a

 First page of search results

17 (38.6)

16 (34.0)

40 (33.3)

58 (46.4)

 Online forums

19 (43.2)

19 (40.4)

38 (31.7)

43 (34.4)

 Hospital websites

9 (20.5)

19 (40.4)

20 (16.7)

18 (14.4)

 Local specialized websites

13 (29.5)

14 (29.8)

30 (25.4)

32 (34.8)

 International specialized articles

5 (11.4)

11 (23.4)

23 (19.2)

13 (10.4)

 Research articles

4 (9.1)

8 (17.0)

30 (25.0)

19 (15.2)

 Email to physicians on Internet websites

1 (2.3)

4 (8.5)

4 (3.3)

1 (0.8)

Numeracy preference itemb(Md, IQR)

  

0.0 (0.0 to 1.0)

0.0 (−2.3 to 1.5)

Objective numeracy (Md, IQR)c

5.0 (4.0–5.0)

5.0 (4.0–5.0)

3.0 (2.0 to 4.0)

3.0 (2.0 to 4.0)

  1. Md median; IQR interquartile range
  2. aMultiple entries allowed
  3. bOne item scale, ranging from −4 (indicating absolute preference towards words in presentation of health information) to + 4 (indicating absolute preference towards numbers in presentation of health information)
  4. cThe scale was calculated as the sum of correct answers, range from 0 to 5