Skip to main content

Table 4 Prediction accuracy key findings

From: Evaluation of survival extrapolation in immuno-oncology using multiple pre-planned data cuts: learnings to aid in model selection

Data cut

Model

Criteria for model selection

Prediction accuracy (months)

PE

RMST

Fitted (earlier) data cut

Latest (36-mo) data cut

Fitted (earlier) data cut

Latest (36-mo) data cut

12-mo

KM estimates

51.8

32.1

8.7

17.5

12-mo

Log-normal

Best AIC, BIC

−0.3

−10.2

−0.2

−0.9

12-mo

Log-logistic

Lowest RMST, PE

−0.7

−11.5

−0.2

−1.2

12-mo

1-knot Odds

Highest RMST, PE

−0.8

−6.6

−0.3

−0.5

18-mo

KM estimates

39.9

32.1

11.3

17.5

18-mo

Log-normal

Best AIC, BIC

+ 1.1

−8.7

+ 0.0

−0.5

18-mo

Log-logistic

Lowest RMST, PE

+ 0.0

−9.8

− 0.0

− 0.8

18-mo

1-knot Odds

Highest RMST

+ 1.2

−5.1

− 0.2

− 0.4

18-mo

3-knot Odds

Highest PE

+ 1.1

−4.8

−0.2

− 0.4

24-mo

KM estimates

35.8

32.1

13.5

17.5

24-mo

1-knot Odds

Best AIC

+ 1.2

−2.0

+ 0.0

+ 0.0

24-mo

Log-normal

Best BIC

−0.1

−6.0

+ 0.4

+ 0.1

24-mo

Log-logistic

Lowest RMST, PE

−1.6

−7.4

+ 0.2

−0.3

24-mo

Gen Gamma

Highest RMST

+ 1.2

−2.7

+ 0.2

+ 0.1

24-mo

3-knot Hazard

Highest PE

+ 0.9

−0.4

−0.1

− 0.1

36-mo

KM estimates

32.1

32.1

17.5

17.5

36-mo

1-knot Hazard

Best AIC, BIC, highest PE

+ 1.4

+ 1.4

+ 0.2

+ 0.2

36-mo

3-knot Hazard

Lowest RMST

+ 0.9

+ 0.9

−0.1

−0.1

36-mo

Log-normal

Highest RMST

−2.3

− 2.3

+ 0.9

+ 0.9

36-mo

Log-logistic

Lowest PE

−4.1

−4.1

+ 0.4

+ 0.4

  1. Key:AIC Akaike’s information criterion; BIC Bayesian information criterion; Gen Generalized; mo Month(s); PE Point estimate; RMST Restricted mean survival time
  2. Note: Negative values indicate that the model underestimates survival, whereas positive values indicate that the model overestimates survival. ‘Fitted’ refers to the data cut from which the models were fitted (i.e. the data cut stated within the left-hand column), and so a comparison is made between a model fitted to a given data cut and the Kaplan-Meier curve for this same data cut. ‘Latest’ refers to the 36-month data cut, and so a comparison is made between a model fitted to the specified data cut (which may be earlier) and the Kaplan-Meier curve for the 36-month data cut. Models were included in this table if one or more of the following criteria were met: (1) the model provided the ‘best’ AIC or BIC score, (2) the model provided either the ‘highest’ or ‘lowest’ estimate of RMST at 36 months, or (3) the model provided either the ‘highest’ or ‘lowest’ PE of survival at 36 months. Where RMST estimates were tied (to the nearest 0.1 month), the model with the lowest AIC or BIC was included here. Full prediction accuracy results are provided within the supplementary material