Consideration | Some recommended references | |
---|---|---|
Missing data (general) | ||
General recommendations | [6] | Sterne et al.: Recommendations for missing data and multiple imputation |
Simple imputation | [36] | Zhang: Mean, median, mode, regression imputations |
Complete-case bias considerations | [37] | Bartlett et al.: When CC is valid |
 | [38] | Carpenter & Kenward: When CC is valid |
Multiple imputation | ||
Number of imputations to use | [15] | White et al.: at least the percentage of incomplete cases |
 | [39] | von Hippel: two-stage quadratic rule |
Covariate selection procedures | [32] | Wood et al.: Repeated use of Rubin’s rules or stacking approach |
 | [40] | Morris et al.: Adapted for MFP including selection procedure and functional form |
Non-linear effects | [40] | Morris et al.: Adapted for MFP including selection procedure and functional form |
 | [41] | Seaman et al.: recommend just another variable (JAV) approach |
Using a Cox model | [3] | White & Royston: inclusion of Nelson-Aalen estimate and event indicator in imputation model |
 | [4] | Bartlett & Seaman: full conditional specification adjusting for the analysis model of choice |
Testing the Proportional hazards assumption and modelling time-varying effects of covariates | [5] | Keogh & Morris: adapting White & Royston and Bartlett & Seaman approaches for time-varying effects |
Time-dependent covariates | [42] | De Silva et al.: Investigating performance of two-fold fully conditional specification for time-dependet covariates |
 | [43] | Moreno-Betancur et al.: Use of joint modelling for time-dependent covariates |
Time-to-event features not concerning missing data | ||
Functional form | [44] | Sauerbrei et al.: multivariable fractional polynomial time i.e. MFP in survival setting accounting for time-varying effects |
 | [45] | Buchholz & Sauerbrei: comparison of procedures for assessing time-varying effects and functional form |
 | [46] | Heinzl & Kaider: Using cubic spline functions to assess functional form |
 | [47] | Wynant & Abrahamowicz: Importance of assessing time-varying effects and functional form |
 | [48] | Abrahamowicz & MacKenzie: Joint estimation of time-varying effects and functional form using splines |
Covariate selection procedures | [44] | See above |
 | [49] | Yan & Huang: Assessing time-varying effects using an adaptive lasso method |
Testing the Proportional hazards assumption | [35] | Austin: Assessing power of tests to assess proportional hazards assumption |
 | [50] | Bellera et al.: Recommend assessing proportional hazards assumption and inclusion of time-varying effects where necessary |
 | [51] | Abrahamowicz et al.: use of regression splines to model time-varying effects |
 | [52] | Hess: use of cubic splines to model time-varying effects |
Time-varying effects | [44] | See above |
 | [45] | See above |
 | [46] | See above |
 | [47] | See above |
 | [48] | See above |
 | [49] | See above |
 | [50] | See above |
 | [52] | See above |
General study considerations | ||
Categorising of covariates | [53] | MacCallum et al.: Discussion on dichotomising continuous covariates |
Non-linear effects | [54] | Royston & Sauerbrei: Text book providing overview of model selection with a focus on MFP procedures |
 | [33] | Harrell: Text book providing overview of strategies for regression modelling |
Covariate selection procedures | [54] | See above |
 | [55] | Heinze et al.: Review of methods for covariate selection |