Skip to main content

Table 4 Selected papers describing methods for addressing common issues arising in the analysis of time-to-event data when there is missing covariate data

From: How are missing data in covariates handled in observational time-to-event studies in oncology? A systematic review

Consideration

Some recommended references

Missing data (general)

General recommendations

[6]

Sterne et al.: Recommendations for missing data and multiple imputation

Simple imputation

[36]

Zhang: Mean, median, mode, regression imputations

Complete-case bias considerations

[37]

Bartlett et al.: When CC is valid

 

[38]

Carpenter & Kenward: When CC is valid

Multiple imputation

Number of imputations to use

[15]

White et al.: at least the percentage of incomplete cases

 

[39]

von Hippel: two-stage quadratic rule

Covariate selection procedures

[32]

Wood et al.: Repeated use of Rubin’s rules or stacking approach

 

[40]

Morris et al.: Adapted for MFP including selection procedure and functional form

Non-linear effects

[40]

Morris et al.: Adapted for MFP including selection procedure and functional form

 

[41]

Seaman et al.: recommend just another variable (JAV) approach

Using a Cox model

[3]

White & Royston: inclusion of Nelson-Aalen estimate and event indicator in imputation model

 

[4]

Bartlett & Seaman: full conditional specification adjusting for the analysis model of choice

Testing the Proportional hazards assumption and modelling time-varying effects of covariates

[5]

Keogh & Morris: adapting White & Royston and Bartlett & Seaman approaches for time-varying effects

Time-dependent covariates

[42]

De Silva et al.: Investigating performance of two-fold fully conditional specification for time-dependet covariates

 

[43]

Moreno-Betancur et al.: Use of joint modelling for time-dependent covariates

Time-to-event features not concerning missing data

Functional form

[44]

Sauerbrei et al.: multivariable fractional polynomial time i.e. MFP in survival setting accounting for time-varying effects

 

[45]

Buchholz & Sauerbrei: comparison of procedures for assessing time-varying effects and functional form

 

[46]

Heinzl & Kaider: Using cubic spline functions to assess functional form

 

[47]

Wynant & Abrahamowicz: Importance of assessing time-varying effects and functional form

 

[48]

Abrahamowicz & MacKenzie: Joint estimation of time-varying effects and functional form using splines

Covariate selection procedures

[44]

See above

 

[49]

Yan & Huang: Assessing time-varying effects using an adaptive lasso method

Testing the Proportional hazards assumption

[35]

Austin: Assessing power of tests to assess proportional hazards assumption

 

[50]

Bellera et al.: Recommend assessing proportional hazards assumption and inclusion of time-varying effects where necessary

 

[51]

Abrahamowicz et al.: use of regression splines to model time-varying effects

 

[52]

Hess: use of cubic splines to model time-varying effects

Time-varying effects

[44]

See above

 

[45]

See above

 

[46]

See above

 

[47]

See above

 

[48]

See above

 

[49]

See above

 

[50]

See above

 

[52]

See above

General study considerations

Categorising of covariates

[53]

MacCallum et al.: Discussion on dichotomising continuous covariates

Non-linear effects

[54]

Royston & Sauerbrei: Text book providing overview of model selection with a focus on MFP procedures

 

[33]

Harrell: Text book providing overview of strategies for regression modelling

Covariate selection procedures

[54]

See above

 

[55]

Heinze et al.: Review of methods for covariate selection

  1. MFP: Multivariable fractional polynomials