TY - STD TI - Moore GF, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350. ID - ref1 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Pawson, R. AU - Tilley, N. PY - 2004 DA - 2004// TI - Realist Evaluation PB - B.C. Office CY - Editor ID - Pawson2004 ER - TY - STD TI - Wong G, et al. RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations. BMC Med. 2016;14. ID - ref3 ER - TY - STD TI - Richards DA, Hallberg IR. Complex Interventions in Health: An Overview of Research Methods. 2015. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. ID - ref4 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Randell, R. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol JO - Implement Sci VL - 9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-52 DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-9-52 ID - Randell2014 ER - TY - STD TI - Pawson, R., L. Owen, And G. Wong. The Today Programme’s Contribution to Evidence-based Policy 2010. 16(2): p. 211–213. ID - ref6 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Booth, A. AU - Carroll, C. PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable? JO - Health Information & Libraries Journal VL - 32 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12108 DO - 10.1111/hir.12108 ID - Booth2015 ER - TY - STD TI - Booth A, Wright J. And B. S., Scoping and searching to support realist approaches. Doing realist research. 2018. London: sage. ID - ref8 ER - TY - STD TI - AHRQ, Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. AHRQ Publication No. 10(14)-EHC063-EF. Chapters available at:www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov. [accessed 27–06-19]. 2014, Rockville, : MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. UR - http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov ID - ref9 ER - TY - STD TI - Aromataris E and M.Z. (Editors). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute. Available fromhttps://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/. 2017. UR - https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/ ID - ref10 ER - TY - STD TI - EUnetHTA., Guideline: process of information retrieval for systematic reviews and health technology assessments on clinical effectiveness. Ver 1.2. . 2017, European network for Health Technology Assessment. ID - ref11 ER - TY - STD TI - Lefebvre C, et al., Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org, 2011. UR - http://www.cochrane-handbook.org ID - ref12 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Greenhalgh, J. PY - 1998 DA - 1998// TI - Reviewing and selecting outcome measures for use in routine practice JO - J Eval Clin Pract VL - 4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.1998.tb00097.x DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1998.tb00097.x ID - Greenhalgh1998 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Stevinson, C. AU - Lawlor, D. A. PY - 2004 DA - 2004// TI - Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns? JO - Complementary Therapies in Medicine VL - 12 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2004.09.003 DO - 10.1016/j.ctim.2004.09.003 ID - Stevinson2004 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Greenhalgh, J. PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care ID - Greenhalgh2018 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Greenhalgh, T. AU - Peacock, R. PY - 2005 DA - 2005// TI - Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources JO - BMJ VL - 331 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68 DO - 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68 ID - Greenhalgh2005 ER - TY - STD TI - Booth, A., Acknowledging a “Dual Heritage” for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Harnessing the Qualitative Research and Systematic Review Research Traditions. 2013, Sheffield: PhD thesis, University of Sheffield. ID - ref17 ER - TY - STD TI - Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton AJ. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. 2011. London: Sage. ID - ref18 ER - TY - STD TI - Papaioannou D, et al., Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 2010. Jun;27(2): p. 114–22. ID - ref19 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Briscoe, S. PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK health technology assessment programme JO - BMC research notes VL - 8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1079-y DO - 10.1186/s13104-015-1079-y ID - Briscoe2015 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Levay, P. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with web of science and Google scholar JO - Res Synth Methods VL - 7 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1158 DO - 10.1002/jrsm.1158 ID - Levay2016 ER - TY - STD TI - Blakeman, K., Top Search Tipshttp://www.rba.co.uk/search/TopSearchTips.pdfaccessed 27–06-19. RBA information, 2018. UR - http://www.rba.co.uk/search/TopSearchTips.pdf ID - ref22 ER - TY - STD TI - Greenhalgh, T., et al., Protocol—the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation. BMJ Open, 2015. 5(8). ID - ref23 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Moore, Z. E. AU - Cowman, S. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers JO - Cochrane Database Syst Rev VL - 2 ID - Moore2014 ER - TY - STD TI - Bethel A and R. M, Search summary table for systematic reviews (SRs). In: Filtering the information overload for better decisions. , in Abstracts of the 23rd Cochrane Colloquium. 2015, John Wiley & Sons: Vienna, Austria. . ID - ref25 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Whiting, P. PY - 2008 DA - 2008// TI - Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies JO - J Clin Epidemiol VL - 61 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.013 DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.013 ID - Whiting2008 ER - TY - STD TI - Levay P and C. J, Systematic Searching 2019, London: Facet publishing. ID - ref27 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Bell, J. PY - 2005 DA - 2005// TI - Are pressure ulcer grading and risk assessment tools useful JO - Wounds UK VL - 1 ID - Bell2005 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Guy, H. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Pressure ulcer risk assessment JO - Nurs Times VL - 103 ID - Guy2012 ER - TY - STD TI - Chapman, S., Nurses underpressure: do risk assessment tools help prevent pressure ulcers https://evidentlycochrane.wordpress.com/2014/02/14/nurses-under-pressure-do-risk-assessment-tools-help-prevent-pressure-ulcers/. Evidently Cochrane, 2014. ID - ref30 ER - TY - STD TI - Green, H., Experience and perceptions using the Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment tool: a community care perspective, in Wounds Uk. 2016: Harrogate. ID - ref31 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Fletcher, J. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - An overview of pressure ulcer risk assessment tools JO - Wounds UK VL - 13 ID - Fletcher2017 ER - TY - STD TI - Torra i Bou, J.E., et al., Risk assessment scales for predicting the risk of developing pressure ulcers, in Science and Practice of Pressure Ulcer Management.. ID - ref33 ER - TY - STD TI - Moore Z, Cowman S. Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database of Sysematic Reviews. 2014;2. ID - ref34 ER - TY - STD TI - E. Johansen Bsc, M., RN, et al., Pressure ulcer risk assessment and prevention: What difference does a risk scale make? A comparison between Norway and Ireland. 2014. 23(7): p. 369–378. ID - ref35 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Kottner, J. AU - Balzer, K. PY - 2010 DA - 2010// TI - Do pressure ulcer risk assessment scales improve clinical practice JO - J Multidiscip Healthc VL - 3 UR - https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S9286 DO - 10.2147/JMDH.S9286 ID - Kottner2010 ER - TY - STD TI - NPUAP/EPUAP/PPPIA, Risk factors and risk assessment chapter.. ID - ref37 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Curkovic, M. AU - Kosec, A. PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - Bubble effect: including internet search engines in systematic reviews introduces selection bias and impedes scientific reproducibility JO - BMC Med Res Methodol VL - 18 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0599-2 DO - 10.1186/s12874-018-0599-2 ID - Curkovic2018 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Adams, J. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies JO - Systematic Reviews VL - 5 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0337-y DO - 10.1186/s13643-016-0337-y ID - Adams2016 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Cooper, C. PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - Supplementary search methods were more effective and offered better value than bibliographic database searching: a case study from public health and environmental enhancement JO - Res Synth Methods VL - 9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1286 DO - 10.1002/jrsm.1286 ID - Cooper2018 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Wright, J. M. AU - Cottrell, D. J. AU - Mir, G. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Searching for religion and mental health studies required health, social science, and grey literature databases JO - J Clin Epidemiol VL - 67 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.017 DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.017 ID - Wright2014 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Stansfield, C. AU - Dickson, K. AU - Bangpan, M. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic? JO - Syst Rev VL - 5 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0371-9 DO - 10.1186/s13643-016-0371-9 ID - Stansfield2016 ER - TY - STD TI - Haddaway NR, et al., The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PloS one, 2015. 17(10): p. 9):e0138237. ID - ref43 ER -