Skip to main content

Table 3 Stealing ideas

From: Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers

 

Number (%)

Should the database (PROSPERO) hide all information and only publish when authors request before submission? Or they just publish the title to avoid duplication?, n = 234

 ➣ Hide all information and publish when the authors request before submission

54 (23.1)

 ➣ Only publish the title to avoid duplication

129 (55.1)

 ➣ Other

51 (22)

Ever experienced a situation in which another group, who did not register their SR/MA protocol, publish before you have a paper based on a protocol identical to yours?, n = 246

16 (6.5)

If another group publishes a paper that is identical to your registered protocol before your team gets the publication and you find out their protocol registered after your protocol. What would be your next step?, n = 190

 ➣ Identify the similarity and difference between your review and published ones and keep working on your own review

112 (59.3)

 ➣ Contact with both authors and editors as they possibly used your ideas

60 (31.2)

 ➣ Other

18 (9.5)

Ever heard of stealing ideas of registered protocol?, n = 256

55 (21.5)

Ever considered that the idea in your protocol could be stolen?, n = 253

121 (47.8)

Have others ever stolen your ideas from a protocol you registered?, n = 243

 ➣ Yes

13 (5.3)

 ➣ No

130 (53.5)

 ➣ Donot know

100 (41.2)

Do you think that people are using the open register to steel other’s idea?, n = 230

 ➣ Yes

86 (37.4)