Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive Results for Best-Fit Models Within Each Model Category

From: Contrasting cumulative risk and multiple individual risk models of the relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and adult health outcomes

 

Depression

Cardiac Disease

Obesity

Model Type

R2

AIC

c-stat

R2

AIC

c-stat

R2

AIC

c-stat

Multiple Individual risk

.197

47,899

.745

.200

27,970

.798

.042

67,013

.609

Best-fit

11 items, ‘once’

11 items, ‘more than once’

11 items, ‘once’ (by AIC)

Cumulative Risk – Categorical

.178

48,638

.734

.200

27,974

.797

.041

67,035

.608

Best-fit

11 items, ‘once’ + quadratic

11 items, ‘more than once’

11 items, ‘once’ (by AIC)

Cumulative Risk –Continuous

.176

48,645

.732

.199

27,979

.796

.041

67,037

.608

Best-fit

9 items, ‘once’ + quadratic

11 items, ‘more than once’

11 items, ‘once’ (by AIC)

  1. R2 is Nagelkerke. (by AIC) indicates that the model comparisons within that model category were not significantly different from each other, and the best fit model was chosen as that with the smaller AIC. For the depression outcome only, the CR continuous model included a quadratic term