Skip to main content

Table 3 Approaches of Competing Risks Flexible Parametric Models

From: Methods of competing risks flexible parametric modeling for estimation of the risk of the first disease among HIV infected men

Model

Measures of associations

What is the model useful for?

How to model?

Advantages

Disadvantages

Which Stata commands?

Cause-specific hazard flexible parametric model

hazard

Etiological questions: which covariates have a causal effect on the occurrence of the event

CSHFPM

Easy to perform (on the original data) and interpret, using the standard FPM

Fitting separate models for each event

stpm2

   

Unified CSHFPM

Fitting one model instead of separate models, using the standard FPM, Ability to handle shared covariate effects

Considering the same knot positions for all events, complex implementation (on the stacked data), Potential convergence problems

Stratified stpm2

Cause-specific subdistribution hazard flexible parametric model

Subdistribution hazard and cumulative incidence function (risk)

Prognosis questions: What fraction of patients are at risk to experience the event at a particular time

SDHFPM1

Fitting a separate model for the event of interest, using the standard FPM

Intensive computation (not ideal for large data sets), no constraint on the sum of CIFs

stcrprep and stpm2

   

SDHFPM2

Fitting a unified model for all events (when the focus is on all events), Easy to perform (on the original data) and interpret, Less computation (ideal for large data sets)

convergence problems for small sample sizes, no constraint on the sum of CIFs

stpm2cr