Skip to main content

Table 2 The Prisma for abstracts checklist as presented by Beller et al. in 2013

From: There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology

Section/topic

#

PRISMA for Abstracts Checklist item

TITLE and PURPOSE

 Title

1

Identify the report as a systematic review (+/− meta-analysis) or both.

 Objectives

2

Indicate the research question, intervention, comparator and outcomes.

METHODS

 Eligibility criteria

3

Include study characteristics used as criteria for eligibility.

 Information sources

4

List the key databases searched and the search dates.

 Risk of bias & applicability

5

Indicate the methods of assessing risk of bias and applicability.

RESULTS

 Included studies

6

Number and type of included studies and the participants and relevant characteristics of studies.

 Synthesis of results

7

Results for main outcomes (benefits and harms), preferablyindicating the number of studies and participants for each.If meta-analysis was done, include summary measures and confidence intervals.

 Description of the effect

8

Direction of the effect (i.e., which group is favoured) and size ofthe effect in terms meaningful to clinicians and patients.

DISCUSSION

 Strengths and limitations

9

Provide a brief summary of the strengths and limitations of the evidence.

 Interpretation

10

Provide a general interpretation of the results and the important implications.

OTHER

 Funding

11

Indicate the primary source of funding for the review.

 Registration

12

Provide the registration number and the registry name.