Skip to main content

Table 4 Unadjusted and corrected sensitivities and specificities of HRA cytology

From: Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard – a comparison of correction methods

Accuracy measures

Methods

Unadjusted (95% CI)

Brenner (95% CI)

Staquet et al (95% CI)

Sensitivity

0.65 (0.52, 0.75)

0.50(0.38, 0.62)

0.89 (0.79, 0.95)

Specificity

0.89 (0.84, 0.93)

0.85 (0.79, 0.89)

0.96 (0.92, 0.98)

  1. CI Confidence interval