Skip to main content

Table 2 Key characteristics of included RCTs and methods for handling missing data

From: A review of the use of controlled multiple imputation in randomised controlled trials with missing outcome data

 

The Lancet

(n = 51)

NEJM

(n = 67)

Total

(n = 118)

Type of Intervention

 Behaviour (diet, exercise, cognitive)

5

10%

4

6%

9

8%

 Medical device

6

12%

1

1%

7

6%

 Diagnostic

2

4%

0

0%

2

2%

 Drug

19

37%

47

70%

66

56%

 Health service strategies

5

10%

2

3%

7

6%

 Psychological

5

10%

0

0%

5

4%

 Surgical

9

18%

13

19%

22

19%

Number of Participants

  < 100

2

4%

4

6%

6

5%

 100 to 499

24

47%

20

30%

44

37%

 500 to 999

16

31%

21

31%

37

31%

 1000 to 4999

8

16%

14

21%

22

19%

  ≥ 5000

1

2%

8

12%

9

8%

Proportion of Missing Primary Outcome Data

  < 10%

21

41%

33

49%

54

46%

 10 to 19%

17

33%

23

34%

40

34%

 20 to 29%

6

12%

4

6%

10

8%

  ≥ 30%

3

6%

4

6%

7

6%

 not clear

4

8%

3

4%

7

6%

Type of Primary Outcome

 Binary

20

39%

34

51%

54

46%

 Continuous

27

53%

30

45%

57

48%

 Count

4

8%

0

0%

4

3%

 Time-to-event

0

0%

3

4%

3

3%

Assessed Differences Between Participants with Complete and Incomplete Data

 Yes

5

10%

6

9%

11

9%

 No

46

90%

61

91%

107

91%

Method of Handling Missing Data in Primary Analysis

 MAR MIa

22

44%

21

31%

43

36%

 Controlled MI

1

2%

1

1%

2

2%

 Complete case

19

38%

39

57%

58

49%

 Single imputation

5

10%

5

7%

10

8%

 Last observation carried forward

3

6%

2

3%

5

4%

Conducted Missing Data Sensitivity Analysis

 Yes

36

71%

59

88%

95

81%

 No

15

29%

8

12%

23

19%

Method of Handling Missing Data in Sensitivity Analysis Where Sensitivity Was Conductedb

 MAR MI

28

68%

42

54%

70

59%

 Controlled MI

3

7%

11

14%

14

12%

 Complete case

6

15%

10

13%

16

13%

 Single imputation

1

2%

8

10%

9

8%

 Last observation carried forward

1

2%

6

8%

7

6%

 Others

2

5%

1

1%

3

3%

Method of Controlled MI (primary or sensitivity analysis)

 Reference-based

2

40%

5

45%

7

44%

 Delta-based

3

60%

6

55%

9

56%

  1. Data presented as n and %. aOne trial using MI under MAR used a hybrid of MI under MAR and worst observation carried forward (single imputation)
  2. b23 trials using two or more different statistical method for sensitivity analysis
  3. Percentages are rounded to 0 decimal places so may not sum exactly to 100%