Table 4 Overview of included SRs and references

Messina J, Campbell S, Morris R, Eyles E, Sanders C. A narrative systematic review of factors affecting diabetes prevention in primary care settings. PLoS One. 2017;12 (5).

15

Al Hamid A, Ghaleb M, Aljadhey H, Aslanpour Z. A systematic review of qualitative research on the contributory factors leading to medicine-related problems from the perspectives of adult patients with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus. BMJ Open. 2014;4 (9).

15

Majeed-Ariss R, Jackson C, Knapp P, Cheater FM. A systematic review of research into black and ethnic minority patients’ views on self-management of type 2 diabetes. Heal Expect. 2015;18 (5):625–42.

50

Rushforth B, McCrorie C, Glidewell L, Midgley E, Foy R. Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: Qualitative systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66 (643):e114–27.

33

Mohammad Mohseni, Tahereh Shams Ghoreishi, Sousan Houshmandi, Ahmad Moosavi, Saber Azami-Aghdash, Zoleykha Asgarlou. Challenges of managing diabetes in Iran: meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Health Services Research. 2020;20 (1).

12

Brundisini F, Giacomini M, DeJean D, Vanstone M, Winsor S, Smith A. Chronic disease patients’ experiences with accessing health care in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013;13 (15):1–33.

5

Van Ryswyk E, Middleton P, Hague W, Crowther C. Clinician views and knowledge regarding healthcare provision in the postpartum period for women with recent gestational diabetes: A systematic review of qualitative/survey studies. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2,014,106 (3):401–1.

13

Vanstone M, Rewegan A, Brundisini F, Giacomini M, Kandasamy S, Dejean D. Diet modification challenges faced by marginalized and nonmarginalized adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Chronic Illness. 2017;13 (1):217–35.

108

Joseph Ngmenesegre Suglo, Catrin Evans. Factors influencing self-management in relation to type 2 diabetes in Africa: A qualitative systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2020;15 (10).

16

Wilkinson A, Whitehead L, Ritchie L. Factors influencing the ability to self-manage diabetes for adults living with type 1 or 2 diabetes. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2014;51 (1):111–22.

27

Campbell F, Lawton J, Rankin D, Clowes M, Coates E, Heller S, et al. Follow-Up Support for Effective type 1 Diabetes self-management (The FUSED Model): A systematic review and meta-ethnography of the barriers, facilitators and recommendations for sustaining self-management skills after attending a structured education programme. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18 (1).

17

Vanstone M, Giacomini M, Smith A, Brundisini F, DeJean D, Winsor S. How diet modification challenges are magnified in vulnerable or marginalized people with diabetes and heart disease: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013;13 (14):1–40.

5

Long H, Bartlett YK, Farmer AJ, French DP. Identifying brief message content for interventions delivered via mobile devices to improve medication adherence in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A rapid systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019;21 (1).

4

Walker RC, Tong A, Howard K, Palmer SC. Patient expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for chronic diseases: Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Med Inform. 2019;124:78–85.

4

DeJean D, Giacomini M, Vanstone M, Brundisini F. Patient experiences of depression and anxiety with chronic disease: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013;13 (16):1–33.

4

Vanstone M, Rewegan A, Brundisini F, Dejean D, Giacomini M. Patient perspectives on quality of life with uncontrolled type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series. 2015;15 (17):1–29.

28

Jain SR, Sui Y, Ng CH, Chen ZX, Goh LH, Shorey S. Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review. 2020;15 (8).

15

Shaw RL, Holland C, Pattison HM, Cooke R. Patients’ perceptions and experiences of cardiovascular disease and diabetes prevention programmes: A systematic review and framework synthesis using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Social Science and Medicine. 2016;156:192–203.

6

Whittemore R, Jaser S, Chao A, Jang M, Grey M. Psychological Experience of Parents of Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Mixed-Studies Review. Diabetes Educ. 2012;38 (4):562–79.

12

Spencer J, Cooper H, Milton B. Qualitative studies of type 1 diabetes in adolescence: A systematic literature review. Pediatric Diabetes. 2010;11 (5):364–75.

26

Zuniga JA, Wright C, Fordyce J, West Ohueri C, Garciá AA. Self-Management of HIV and Diabetes in African American Women: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature. Diabetes Educ. 2018;44 (5):419–34.

2

Jones E, Sinclair JMA, Holt RIG, Barnard KD. Social networking and understanding alcohol-associated risk for people with type 1 diabetes: Friend or foe? Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15 (4):308–14.

6

Due-Christensen M, Zoffmann V, Willaing I, Hopkins D, Forbes A. The Process of Adaptation Following a New Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes in Adulthood: A Meta-Synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2018;28 (2):245–58.

8

Saunders T. Type 2 diabetes self-management barriers in older adults: An integrative review of the qualitative literature. J Gerontol Nurs. 2019;45 (3):43–54.

9

Villalba C, Jaiprakash A, Donovan J, Roberts J, Crawford R. Unlocking the Value of Literature in Health Co-Design: Transforming Patient Experience Publications into a Creative and Accessible Card Tool. Patient. 2018;11 (6):637–48.

12

Van Ryswyk E, Middleton P, Shute E, Hague W, Crowther C. Women’s views and knowledge regarding healthcare seeking for gestational diabetes in the postpartum period: A systematic review of qualitative/survey studies. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2015;110 (2):109–22.

49