Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies with meta-regression analysis

From: Most published meta-regression analyses based on aggregate data suffer from methodological pitfalls: a meta-epidemiological study

Characteristics

Total (N = 81)

Year 2002 (N = 29)

Year 2012 (N = 52)

Journal characteristics

Journal Impact Factor, median (IQR)

4.2 (2.3–6.1)

4.4 (2.9–5.6)

3.9 (2.0–6.6)

General medical journal

15 (19%)

5 (17%)

10 (19%)

Core clinical journals

19 (23%)

9 (31%)

10 (19%)

Author characteristics

Affiliated with industry

5 (6%)

3 (10%)

2 (4%)

Affiliated with biostatistics or epidemiology department

35 (43%)

16 (55%)

19 (37%)

Ten or more of studies

73 (90%)

26 (90%)

47 (90%)

Drug intervention

38 (47%)

15 (52%)

23 (44%)

Type of outcome in meta-regression analysis

Binary

39 (48%)

13 (45%)

26 (50%)

Continuous

48 (59%)

18 (62%)

30 (58%)

Clinical field

Psychiatry & Psychology

13 (16%)

5 (17%)

8 (15%)

Cardiology

10 (12%)

3 (10%)

7 (13%)

Oncology

8 (10%)

1 (3%)

7 (13%)

Infectious disease

7 (9%)

2 (7%)

5 (10%)

Endocrinology & Metabolism

7 (9%)

3 (10%)

4 (8%)

Surgery

6 (7%)

0 (0%)

6 (12%)

General internal medicine

5 (6%)

3 (10%)

2 (4%)

Paediatrics

4 (5%)

2 (7%)

2 (4%)

Nutrition & dietetics

4 (5%)

0 (0%)

4 (8%)

Rheumatology

4 (5%)

3 (10%)

1 (2%)

Miscellaneous

13 (16%)

7 (24%)

6 (12%)

  1. There were no important differences in baseline characteristics between the two assessed years