Skip to main content

Table 2 Re-uses cited by policy sources

From: Social media attention and citations of published outputs from re-use of clinical trial data: a matched comparison with articles published in the same journals

Published outputs

Title

Type of study

Policy sources

How cited

Joanna Le Noury et al. 2015

Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence

Re-analysis

The state of open data. 25 Oct 2016

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4036398

In a chapter stating the ethical necessity of open data in medical research, the re-use is cited as a subsequent analysis that debunked the previous results of the study 329 which stated that “Paroxetine is generally well tolerated and effective for major depression in adolescents”

Merryn Voysey et al. 2017

The Influence of Maternally Derived Antibody and Infant Age at Vaccination on Infant Vaccine Responses

Meta-analysis

World Health Organization. (2018). The immunological basis for immunization series: module 3: tetanus: update 2018. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/275340. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

The re-use was cited in the immunological basis for immunization series: module 3: tetanus: update 2018 from World Health Organization but the exact context in the text was not found

Joseline Guetsop Zafack et al. 2019

Adverse events following immunisation with four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB): interaction with co-administration of routine infant vaccines and risk of recurrence in European randomised controlled trials

Secondary analysis

The National Immunisation Programme in the Netherlands: Surveillance and developments in 2018–2019

The re-use was cited in the national immunisation programme in the Netherlands for the 2018–2019 period but the exact context was not found in the text

Mark Corbett et al. 2017

Certolizumab pegol and secukinumab for treating active psoriatic arthritis following inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic review and economic evaluation

Meta-analysis

National Institute for Health Care Excellence (NICE) guidance: Ixekizumab for treating active psoriatic arthritis after inadequate response to DMARDs (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta537/evidence/committee-papers-pdf-4913117821)

The meta-analysis was cited in NICE as a reference regarding the use of a York model and details on its implementation (5 times): a reference regarding resource use estimates for controlled and uncontrolled psoriasis, a reference for psoriasis severity classification according to the York model, a reference for psoriasis evolution without treatment and a reference stating the lack of clinically meaningful difference in bDMARD responses rates for joint disease or psoriasis between 12 to 24 weeks

G. A. Mospan et al. 2016

5-Day versus 10-Day Course of Fluoroquinolones in Outpatient Males with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)

Secondary analysis

NICE guidance: Urinary tract infection (lower): antimicrobial prescribing (evidence review)

The re-use is cited as an excluded study in the NICE evidence review (non-relevant population) so it did not contribute to the policy source content

Lauren M. Schwartz et al. 2016

Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in low-income settings: An evaluation of the test-negative design

Secondary analysis

World Health Organization. (2020). The immunological basis for immunization series: module 21: rotavirus vaccines. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331323. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

The re-use was cited in the immunological basis for immunization series: module 21: rotavirus vaccines from World Health Organization but the exact context was not found in the text