Skip to main content

Table 2 Meta-analysis summary table

From: Systematic review and meta analysis of differential attrition between active and control arms in randomized controlled trials of lifestyle interventions in chronic disease

Study Risk ratio 95% CI %weight
Racine et al., 2011 [28] 1.00 0.97 to 1.03 13.04
Yamada et al., 2014 [33] 1.00 0.86 to 1.17 2.48
Andrews et al., 2011 [14] 1.06 1.00 to 1.11 9.60
Barrera et al., 2006 [22] 0.90 0.83 to 0.98 6.05
Callisaya et al., 2017 [29] 0.96 0.80 to 1.15 1.94
Cheskin et al., 2008 [25] 2.15 1.00 to 4.61 0.12
Clark et al., 2004 [15] 1.04 0.95 to 1.15 4.82
Glasgow et al., 2000 [30] 1.00 0.87 to 1.15 3.01
Hesselink et al., 2004 [13] 1.18 0.99 to 1.42 1.90
Hilbernik et al., 2005 [23] 1.01 0.97 to 1.05 11.33
John et al., 2012 [34] 1.14 0.99 to 1.30 3.05
Jonsdottir et al., 2015 [16] 0.91 0.78 to 1.06 2.39
Khunti et al., 2012 [12] 1.08 0.99 to 1.18 6.02
Larsen, et al., 2011 [26] 0.93 0.84 to 1.02 4.99
Lee et al., 2015 [17] 1.00 0.90 to 1.11 4.75
Meyer et al., 2015 [18] 1.16 0.82 to 1.63 0.58
Nam et al., 2012 [24] 0.81 0.69 to 0.95 2.25
Ng et al., 2011 [31] 0.79 0.57 to 1.10 0.63
Nicolucci et al., 2012 [19] 1.00 0.95 to 1.05 10.08
Praet et al., 2008 [27] 0.95 0.66 to 1.36 0.53
Sevick et al., 2012 [32] 1.01 0.93 to 1.09 6.27
Walters et al., 2013 [20] 0.95 0.84 to 1.07 3.48
Wilson et al., 2008 [21] 0.96 0.69 to 1.30 0.69
exp(theta) 1.00 0.97 to 1.03