Skip to main content

Table 2 Use of software reported in the systematic reviews

From: Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews

 

Total (n = 152)

Cochrane (n = 75)

Non-Cochrane (n = 77)

Software used for study selection

 Covidence

18 (12%)

16 (21%)

2 (3%)

 DistillerSR

2 (1%)

0 (0%)

2 (3%)

 EndNote

11 (7%)

5 (7%)

7 (9%)

 Microsoft Excel

2 (1%)

1 (1%)

1 (1%)

 Rayyan

2 (1%)

0 (0%)

2 (3%)

 Other

3 (2%)

1 (1%)

2 (3%)

 None reported

122 (80%)

58 (77%)

64 (83%)

Software used for data extraction

 Covidence

9 (6%)

8 (11%)

1 (1%)

 DistillerSR

2 (1%)

0 (0%)

2 (3%)

 Microsoft Excel

3 (2%)

2 (3%)

1 (1%)

 Other

4 (3%)

1 (1%)

3 (4%)

 None reported

133 (88%)

63 (84%)

70 (91%)

Software used for statistical analysis

 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

6 (4%)

0 (0%)

6 (8%)

 R

10 (7%)

0 (0%)

10 (13%)

 RevMan

100 (66%)

73 (97%)

27 (35%)

 Stata

18 (12%)

2 (3%)

16 (21%)

 Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA)

4 (3%)

2 (3%)

2 (3%)

 Other

7 (5%)

2 (3%)

5 (6%)

 None reported

20 (13%)

2 (3%)

18 (23%)

Software used for grading of evidence

 GRADEpro GDT

72 (47%)

70 (93%)

2 (3%)

No software use reported

12 (8%)

0 (0%)

12 (16%)

  1. Data given as number (percent); percentages rounded to the whole number; more than one software for the same purpose was used in some reviews