Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of joint modelling approaches used to incorporate longitudinal data and survival data

From: Modelling of longitudinal data to predict cardiovascular disease risk: a methodological review

Method

N(%)[refs]

Longitudinal outcome type

Disease outcome type

How the longitudinal data were used in the analysis

N (%) [refs]

Reason for the use of method

Assumptions

Pros

Cons

Frequentist joint model, N = 6 (75.0) [86, 87, 89, 91,92,93]

Continuous

Time to event

Longitudinal data were modelled in LME. Survival data were modelled in Cox PH. N = 5 (62.5) [86, 87, 91,92,93]

Association structures:

Current value, N = 2 (25.0) [86, 93]

Current value and 1st derivative, N = 2 (25.0) [91, 92]

1st derivative, N = 1 (12.5) [87]

To predict changes in risk score over time using repeated measures

None considered

Includes all measured values of longitudinal variable

Computationally very hard model to fit

Continuous

Time to event

Structured equation model incorporated in survival model as covariate, N = 1 (12.5) [89]

To incorporate a constant change or variation in the survival model

PH; Change is linear

Incorporates information from all time points

Does not allow for adjustment by other covariates as it cannot calculate overall coefficients

Latent class model, N = 1 (12.5) [88]

Continuous

Time to event

Latent class model used to calculate trajectory of longitudinal variable. Trajectory class incorporated in model as covariate, N = 1 (12.5) [88]

To find groups for the trajectories based on the data

PH; Population of trajectories arises from a finite mixture

Very effective at summarizing trajectories

Cannot place patients into trajectory groups easily in clinical practice; Computationally very hard model to fit

Bayesian approach, N = 1 (12.5) [90]

Ordinal

Time to event

Item response theory models were used to model ordinal data from a multi-question survey using a latent parameter. This latent parameter was modelled using a linear growth model and was incorporated in a multi-state Gompertz survival model as a covariate, N = 1 (12.5) [90]

To model ordinal survey data with the correct distribution

Values constant between observations

Incorporates data from complex survey accounting for ordinal data modelling the data directly rather than modelling the sum of the responses

Complex and requires Bayesian code to be used to define the model

  1. LME - Linear Mixed Effects; PH - Proportional Hazard