Table 2 FDR of our proposed meta-analysis method (BACON adjusted Weighted Z) and the other methods in comparison with unequal sample sizes of the experiments
From: Robust meta-analysis for large-scale genomic experiments based on an empirical approach
Setting | Method | FDR |
|---|---|---|
1 | Fisher | 0.05 |
EAMA | 0.06 | |
BACON adjusted Fisher | 0.05 | |
weighted Z | 0.05 | |
EB adjusted weighted Z | 0.03 | |
BACON adjusted weighted Z | 0.05 | |
2 | Fisher | 0.89 |
EAMA | 0.05 | |
BACON adjusted Fisher | 0.03 | |
weighted Z | 0.90 | |
EB adjusted weighted Z | 0.06 | |
BACON adjusted weighted Z | 0.04 | |
3 | Fisher | 0.05 |
EAMA | 0.12 | |
BACON adjusted Fisher | 0.05 | |
weighted Z | 0.05 | |
EB adjusted weighted Z | 0.03 | |
BACON adjusted weighted Z | 0.05 |