Skip to main content

Table 3 The questions and supporting evidence from rapid reviews

From: Methodology and experiences of rapid advice guideline development for children with COVID-19: responding to the COVID-19 outbreak quickly and efficiently

Questions

Rapid review(s) to answer the questions

Studies included in the rapid review

Was the recommendation fully supported by evidence from COVID-19 (Yes/Partially/No)

Was the recommendation fully supported by evidence from children with COVID-19 (Yes/Partially /No)

Proportion of preprints in the COVID-19 studies per rapid review

Clinical question 1: what are the symptoms of children with COVID-19 and who needs further assessment?

One rapid review

(produced by RRG)

Wang Z et al., 2020 [45]

Number of primary studies: 49

Study design: 25 case reports, 23 case series and one cohort study

Patients: All patients are children with COVID-19

Sources: Seven preprints, 42 journal articles

Yes, 100%

Yes, 100%

14.3% (7/49)

Clinical question 2: how should children who have had contact with COVID-19 patients be managed?

Three rapid reviews(two rapid reviews produced by RRG, one published article)

Gao Y et al., 2020 [46]

Number of primary studies:9

Study design: 9 cross-sectional studies

Patients: One article was about COVID-19 (all patients were adults), eight articles were about SARS

Sources: Zero preprint, 9 journal articles

Partially, 11%

No, 0%

0.0%(0/4)

Zhou Q et al., 2020 [47]

Number of primary studies: 40

Study design: Nine case series, 30 cross-sectional studies and one case–control

Patients: Four articles were about adults with COVID-19, 25 articles were about SARS, 11 articles were about MERS

Sources: Zero preprint, 40 journal articles

Partially, 10%

No, 0%

0.0%(0/1)

Nussbaumer-Streit B et al., 2020 [57]

Number of primary studies:29

Study design: Four cohort studies and 25 modelling studies

Patients: 10 articles were about COVID-19 (almost patients were adults), 15 articles were about SARS, two articles were about MERS and two articles were about SARS and other infectious diseases

Sources: Zero preprint, 28 journal articles and one unpublished report

Partially, 34%

No, 0%*

0.0%(0/10)

Clinical question 3: should computed tomography (CT) scan be used for the diagnosis and monitoring of children with COVID-19?

One rapid review (produced by RRG)

Lv M et al., 2020 [48]

Number of primary studies: 103

Study design: 82 case series and 21 case reports

Patients: All articles were about COVID-19, 7 articles were only included children, other articles were included adults

Sources: Five preprints, 98 journal articles

Partially, 100%

Partial, 6.8%a

4.8%(5/103)

Clinical question 4: should antiviral drugs such as ribavirin, interferon, remdesivir (GS-5734), lopinavir/ritonavir or oseltamivir be used to treat children with COVID-19?

One rapid review (produced by RRG)

Shi Q et al., 2020 [49]

Number of primary studies: 23

Study design: Six randomized controlled trials and 17 cohort studies

Patients: Seven articles were about COVID-19 (almost patients were adults), 13 articles were about SARS, three articles were about MERS

Sources: Three preprints, 20 journal articles

Partially, 30%

No, 0%a

42.9%(3/7)

Clinical question 5: should antibiotics be used to treat children with COVID-19?

One rapid review (produced by RRG)

Wang J et al., 2020 [50]

Number of primary studies: Six

Study design: Five case series and one cohort study

Patients: Five articles were about SARS and one article was about MERS

Sources: Zero preprint, six journal articles

No, 0%

No, 0%

NA

Clinical question 6: should systemic corticosteroids be used to treat children with severe COVID-19?

One rapid review (produced by RRG)

Lu S et al., 2020 [51]

Number of primary studies: 23

Study design: One randomized controlled trial and 22 cohort studies

Patients: Five articles were about COVID-19 (all patients were adults), 17 articles were about SARS and one article was about MERS

Sources: Two preprints, 21 journal articles

Partially, 22%

No, 0%

40.0% (2/5)

Clinical question 7: should intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) be used to treat children with severe COVID-19?

One rapid review (produced by RRG)

Zhang J et al., 2020 [52]

Number of primary studies: Six

Study design: One randomized controlled trial, four case series and one case report

Patients: Two articles were about COVID-19 (all patients were adults) and four articles were about SARS

Sources: One preprint, five journal articles

Partially, 33%

No, 0%

50.0% (1/2)

Clinical question 8: what is appropriate supportive care for children with severe COVID-19?

One umbrella review (produced by RRG)

Luo X et al., 2020 [53]

Number of primary studies: 18

Study design: 18 systematic reviews

Patients: 18 articles were not about COVID-19, SARS and MERS

Sources: Zero preprint, 18 journal articles

No, 0%

No, 0%

NA

Clinical question 9: should mothers with COVID-19 continue to breastfeed their babies?

Two rapid reviews (one rapid review produced by RRG, one previously published article)

Yang N et al., 2020 [54]

Number of primary studies: Six

Study design: Five case reports and one case series

Patients: Five articles were about COVID-19 (all patients were mothers) and one article was influenza

Sources: Zero preprint, six journal articles

Partially, 83%

No, 0%

0.0% (0/5)

Jefferson T et al., 2011 [59]

Number of primary studies: 67

Study design: Six randomized controlled trials, 17 non-randomized controlled trials, nine case–control studies, 22 cohort studies and 13 before-after controlled studies

Patients: 67 articles were not about COVID-19 and MERS

Sources: Six journal articles

No, 0%

No, 0%

NA

Clinical question 10: how should parents be advised to get information on SARS-CoV-2 infection?

One rapid review (produced by RRG)

Li W et al., 2020 [55]

Number of primary studies: 24

Study design: 24 cross-sectional studies

Patients: Six articles were about COVID-19 (almost patients were adults), eight articles were about SARS, ten articles were about MERS

Sources: Zero preprint, 24 journal articles

Partially, 25%

No, 0%a

0.0% (0/6)

  1. RRG Rapid Review Group
  2. aOnly a small population of the included COVID-19 studies were pediatric patients, so we do not consider evidence from these studies as evidence from children with COVID-19