Table 2 True prevalence results (mean and quantile of the 95% credible interval (Q) of the toy example with 24% and 5% apparent prevalence, 500 sample size, 120/25 positive tests with consistent assumptions on sensitivity (80%) and specificity (90%). Speybroek et al. 2012 Model 1 assumes fixed values for Se and Sp, while Model 2 assumes Se∼Unif(0.7,0.9) and Sp∼Unif(0.85,0.95). For the |tPRiors| example, Se∼Beta(195.76,48.94) and Sp∼Beta(135.86,15.1), while for Setup A: π_t∼Beta(1,1) and Setup B: π_t∼Beta(1.3,1.3)

From: |tPRiors |: a tool for prior elicitation and obtaining posterior distributions of true disease prevalence