Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies (N = 871)

From: Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption

Variable

N (%)a

Study design

 Overview of systematic reviews

612 (70)

 Methodological study

160 (18)

 Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews

61 (7.0)

 Guideline

29 (3.3)

 Policy brief with evidence synthesis

1 (0.01)

 Health Technology Assessment

1 (0.01)

 Protocol for a methodological study

1 (0.01)

 Methodological study and overview of systematic reviews

1 (0.01)

 Rapid review appraisal

1 (0.01)

 Guideline assessment

1 (0.01)

 Guideline protocol

1 (0.01)

 Consensus statement

1 (0.01)

Type of report

 Full manuscript

826 (95)

 Conference abstract

45 (5.2)

The most common journals where analyzed articles were published

BMJ Open

31 (3.6)

Systematic Reviews

23 (2.6)

PLoS One

22 (2.5)

Medicine

22 (2.5)

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

19 (2.2)

 Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

14 (1.6)

 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

13 (1.5)

 Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

11 (1.3)

 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

11 (1.3)

AMSTAR version used

 AMSTAR 2

451 (52)

 AMSTAR

382 (44)

 R-AMSTAR

31 (3.6)

 Both AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2

5 (0.006)

 Both AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR

1 (0.001)

 Unclear whether AMSTAR or AMSTAR 2 was used

1 (0.001)

References used to support the use of AMSTAR more than two times (N = 382)

 Shea et al., 2007, BMC Medical Research Methodology [1]

216 (57)

 Shea et al., 2009 [5]

94 (25)

 Shea et al., 2007, PLoS One [6]

20 (5.2)

 Shea et al., 2017 [2]

11 (2.9)

 AMSTAR web site

6 (1.6)

 Pieper et al., 2015 [7]

6 (1.6)

 Sharif et al., 2013 [8]

6 (1.6)

 Pollock et al., 2017 [9]

4 (1.0)

 Xiong et al., 2009 [10]

3 (0.8)

References used to support the use of AMSTAR 2 (N = 451)

 Shea et al., 2017 [2]

396 (88)

 Shea et al., 2007, BMC Medical Research Methodology [1]

14 (3.1)

 Shea et al., 2009 [5]

9 (2.0)

 AMSTAR web site

8 (1.8)

 Zhang et al., 2018

3 (0.07)

 Lorenz et al., 2019 [11]

2 (0.04)

 Shea et al., 2007 PLoS One [6]

2 (0.04)

 Ge et al., 2017 [12]

2 (0.04)

 Banzi et al. 2018

1 (0.02)

 Biondi-Zoccai, 2016 [13]

1 (0.02)

 Brouwers et al., 2010 [14]

1 (0.02)

 Ciapponi, 2017 [15]

1 (0.02)

 Pieper et al., 2014 [16]

1 (0.02)

 Pollock et al., 2017 [9]

1 (0.02)

 Tian et al., 2017 [17]

1 (0.02)

 Xiong et al., 2009 [18]

1 (0.02)

 Yan et al., 2018 [19]

1 (0.02)

References used to support the use of R-AMSTAR (N = 12)

 Kung et al., 2010 [20]

23 (75)

 Shea et al., 2017 [2]

3 (9.7)

 Shea et al., 2007, BMC Medical Research Methodology [1]

3 (9.7)

 Dosenovic et al., 2018 [21]

 

 Rotta et al., 2015 [22]

1

 Shea et al., 2007 PLoS One [6]

 
  1. aThe percentages for each variable may not add up to 100 due to rounding