Skip to main content

Table 3 Joint prevalence and prevalence difference distributions among multimorbidity networks constructed with select association measures

From: The effect of disease co-occurrence measurement on multimorbidity networks: a population-based study

Association measure

Top 200 associationsa

Top 50% of associationsb

Joint prevalence

Prevalence difference

Joint prevalence

Prevalence difference

Lift

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

0.3 (0.1-0.8)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

0.9 (0.4-1.9)

Relative risk

0.0 (0.0-0.1)

0.4 (0.1-1.3)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

1.0 (0.4-2.1)

Phi

0.4 (0.2-0.9)

2.2 (0.6-6.3)

0.0 (0.0-0.1)

1.4 (0.6-3.4)

Jaccard

0.5 (0.3-1.1)

2.0 (0.5-5.0)

0.0 (0.0-0.1)

1.1 (0.4-2.4)

Cosine

0.6 (0.3-1.2)

3.2 (1.1-7.7)

0.0 (0.0-0.1)

1.5 (0.6-3.8)

Kulczynski

0.4 (0.1-0.9)

17.9 (3.6-22.0)

0.0 (0.0-0.1)

2.3 (1.1-4.7)

Joint prevalence

0.7 (0.6-1.2)

6.8 (3.4-12.9)

0.0 (0.0-0.1)

1.7 (0.7-4.1)

  1. Data are presented as median (Q1-Q3), where Q1 = 25th percentile and Q3 = 75th percentile
  2. Joint prevalence and prevalence difference measured between disease node pairs
  3. aDisease network was limited to the 200 strongest associations (i.e., largest effect size)
  4. bDisease network was limited to the strongest 50% (n = 3922) of all statistically significant associations