Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Medical Research Methodology

Fig. 3

From: Comparing outcomes from tailored meta-analysis with outcomes from a setting specific test accuracy study using routine data of faecal calprotectin testing for inflammatory bowel disease

Fig. 3

Sensitivity and false positive rate pairs in ROC space from conventional meta-analysis, tailored meta-analysis and THIN data. Tailored meta-analysis was undertaken using the binomial and Mahalanobis distance methods. The applicable region (trapezium) was informed by routine data from primary care. TMA tailored meta-analysis, THIN the health improvement network

Back to article page