From: Assessing the effectiveness of empirical calibration under different bias scenarios
Bias Scenario | Experiment Group | Outcome generation function |
---|---|---|
Reference case | 1 | f⋆ and f− depend on X |
Unmeasured confounder (U) | 2.1 | f⋆ and f− depend on X and U |
2.2 | Only f⋆ depends on X and U | |
Model misspecification: Quadratic term (\({X}_1^2\)) | 3.1 | f⋆ and f− depend on X and \({\mathrm{X}}_1^2\) |
3.2 | Only f⋆ depends on X and \({X}_1^2\) | |
Model misspecification: Interaction between two confounders (X1X2) | 4.1 | f⋆ and f− depend on X and X1X2 |
4.2 | Only f⋆ depends on X and X1X2 | |
Lack of positivity Lack of overlap between treatment groups in terms of propensity score. | 5.1 | f⋆ and f− depend on X. |
5.2 | Only f⋆ depends on X. | |
Measurement error in confounder | 6 | f⋆ and f− depend on X. One of the confounders with large effect have random measurement error. |