Skip to main content

Table 4 Practitioner-related equality assumption score

From: Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review

 

Acu

(n = 77)

Mas

(n = 8)

Rei

(n = 2)

Ref

(n = 20)

TT

(n = 3)

Mob

(n = 109)

Man

(n = 92)

Mix

(n = 4)

Total

(n = 315)

0/6

10

(12.3%)

1

(12.5%)

0

(0%)

0

(0%)

0

(0%)

11

(10.2%)

6

(6.5%)

0

(0%)

28

(8.9%)

1/6

8

(10.4%)

2

(25.0%)

0

(0%)

5

(25.0%)

0

(0%)

12

(11.0%)

13

(14.1%)

0

(0%)

40

(12.7%)

2/6

12

(15.6%)

2

(25.0%)

1

(50.0%)

4

(30.0%

0

(0%)

32

(29.4%)

35

(38.0%)

2

(50.0%)

88

(27.9%)

3/6

19

(24.7%)

2

(25.0%)

1

(50.0%)

11

(55.0%)

2

(66.7%)

47

(43.1%)

28

(30.4%)

2

(50.0%)

112

(35.6%)

4/6

10

(13.0%)

1

(12.5%)

0

(0%)

0

(0%)

1

(33.3%)

6

(5.5%)

9

(9.8%)

0

(0%)

27

(8.6%)

5/6

18

(23.4%)

0

(0%)

0

(0%)

0

(0%)

0

(0%)

1

(0.9%)

1

(1.1%)

0

(0%)

20

(6.3%)

  1. Acu Acupressure, Mas Massage, Rei Reiki, TT Therapeutic Touch, Mob Mobilisation, Man Manipulation, Mix Mixed-Method
  2. No studies scored 6/6