Skip to main content

Table 3 Differences in reporting characteristics and the use of restrictions between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane reviews indexed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), 2000–2019

From: Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational study

Characteristics *

Cochrane reviews (n = 81)

Non-Cochrane reviews (n = 454)

Total (n = 535)

Named article as a SR

19/81 (23.5%)

349/454 (76.9%)

368/535 (68.8%)

PRISMA referenced

0/81 (0%)

166/454 (36.6%)

166/535 (31.0%)

Date of search reported

79/81 (97.5%)

399/454 (87.9%)

478/535 (89.4%)

Full search strategy available

62/81 (76.5%)

225/441 (51.0%)

287/522 (55.0%)

Assessment of validity

74/76 (97.4%)

334/453 (73.4%)

408/529 (77.1%)

Flow chart available

35/81 (43.2%)

377/452 (83.4%)

412/533 (77.3%)

Restriction of publication period

 Not reported

18/81 (22.2%)

60/454 (13.2%)

78/535 (14.6%)

 Without restriction of period

55/81 (67.9%)

253/454 (55.7%)

308/535 (57.6%)

 With restriction of period

8/81 (9.9%)

141/454 (31.1%)

149/535 (27.9%)

  Restriction justified

5/8 (62.5%)

28/141 (19.9%)

33/149 (22.2%)

Restriction of study type

 Not reported

0/81 (0%)

102/454 (22.5%)

102/535 (19.1%)

 Only RCTs included

46/81 (56.8%)

168/454 (37.0%)

214/535 (40.0%)

 NRSI and RCTs included

35/81 (43.2%)

184/454 (40.5%)

219/535 (40.9%)

  Eligibility of study type justified **

4/81 (4.9%)

24/352 (6.8%)

28/433 (6.5%)

Restriction of language

 Not reported

17/81 (21.0%)

81/454 (17.8%)

98/535 (18.3%)

 Without language restriction

60/81 (74.1%)

129/454 (28.4%)

189/535 (35.3%)

 With language restriction

4/81 (4.9%)

244/454 (53.7%)

248/535 (46.4%)

  Restriction justified

1/4 (25.0%)

7/244 (2.9%)

8/248 (3.2%)

 Point of language restriction

   Unclear

1/4 (25.0%)

129/244 (52.9%)

130/248 (52.4%)

   Search strategy

0/4 (0%)

51/244 (20.9%)

51/248 (20.6%)

   Screening

3/4 (75.0%)

64/244 (26.2%)

67/248 (27.0%)

Failed to report at least one of the restrictions considered

29/81 (35.8%)

192/454 (42.3%)

221/535 (41.3%)

  1. Data provided as figures (percent). SR Systematic Review, NRSI Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions, RCTs Randomized Controlled Trials
  2. * The denominator of fractions differs due to missing values (i.e. the information was not available due to a lack of access to the additional material) or as items are not applicable because no studies were included, or no restrictions were applied
  3. ** Study types justified is based on both categories Only RCTs included and NRSI and RCTs included