Evaluating the sensitivity of jurisdictional heterogeneity and jurisdictional mixing in national level HIV prevention analyses: context of the U.S. ending the HIV epidemic plan

Table 2 Assumptions of sexual partnership mixing across jurisdictions

*Mixing assumption ➔*	Level-1mixing^a			Level-2 mixing^a			Level-3 mixing^a
*Risk group ➔*	HM	HF	MSM	HM	HF	MSM	HM	HF	MSM
*Jurisdictional interaction category*	HM	HF	MSM	HM	HF	MSM	HM	HF	MSM
Same jurisdiction	90%	90%	85%	57%	65%	47%	57%	65%	47%
Other jurisdiction same state	10%	10%	15%	43%	35%	53%	28%	23%	31%
Other states	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	14%	12%	22%

HM Heterosexual males, HF Heterosexual females, MSM Men who have sex with men;
^aValues represent proportion of partnership mixing with the jurisdictional interaction category

ISSN: 1471-2288