Skip to main content

Table 1 Record characteristics reported by significance of effect estimate.: non-significant (n = 234) and significant (n = 1101). The distribution of articles by specialty of journal, study type (in-vitro, interventional, observational) and significance of results are shown in Fig. 2

From: Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals

Variable

Non-significant N (%)

Significant N (%)

Journal title

 JDR

2 (2.2)

90 (97.8)

 JADA

2 (6.1)

31 (93.9)

 EJO

18 (32.1)

38 (67.9)

 AJODO

22 (22.9)

74 (77.1)

 JCP

26 (27.7)

68 (72.3)

 JOP

24 (13.3)

156 (86.7)

 JOE

18 (13.3)

117 (86.7)

 IJOMS

40 (28.2)

102 (71.8)

 JOMS

38 (15.8)

203 (84.2)

 PD

5 (25.0)

15 (75.0)

 EJPD

4 (19.0)

17 (81.0)

 JPD

26 (15.3)

144 (84.7)

 JOPR

9 (16.4)

46 (83.6)

Specialty Journal

 General oral health journals

4 (3.2)

121 (96.8)

 Orthodontics

40 (26.3)

112 (73.7)

 Periodontology

50 (18.2)

224 (81.8)

 Endodontics

18 (13.3)

117 (86.7)

 Oral and Maxillofacial surgey

78 (20.4)

305 (79.6)

 Pedatrics

9 (22.0)

32 (78.0)

 Prosthodontics

35 (15.6)

190 (84.4)

Continent of corresponding author

 Europe

72 (23.5)

235 (76.5)

 Americas

80 (17.1)

389 (82.9)

 Asia or other

82 (14.7)

477 (85.3)

Study type

 In-vitro

42 (9.2)

417 (90.8)

 Interventional

91 (32.9)

186 (67.1)

 Observational

101 (16.9)

498 (83.1)

Ethical approval

 Not reported

43 (13.0)

287 (87.0)

 Approval obtained

191 (19.0)

814 (81.0)

Involvement of statistician

 No

212 (17.2)

1020 (82.8)

 Yes

22 (21.4)

81 (78.6)

Study registration

 No

180 (14.8)

1034 (85.2)

 Yes

54 (44.6)

67 (55.4)

Conflict of interest

 No

226 (17.6)

1059 (82.4)

 Yes

8 (16.0)

42 (84.0)