Skip to main content

Table 2 Predictive performance of all models on 35 variables (mean and 95% empirical bootstrap interval)

From: Multivariate longitudinal data for survival analysis of cardiovascular event prediction in young adults: insights from a comparative explainable study

Strategy

Model

iAUC

C-index

Last AUC

Time-series (TS) massive feature extraction

RSF on TS-extracted features

0.808 (0.790, 0.826)

0.778 (0.757, 0.801)

0.758 (0.733, 0.784)

LASSO-Cox on TS-extracted features

0.744 (0.711, 0.781)

0.713 (0.686, 0.739)

0.701 (0.674, 0.727)

Recurrent neural network

Dynamic-DeepHit

0.794 (0.764, 0.825)

0.767 (0.745, 0.789)

0.762 (0.733, 0.792)

Trajectory clustering

RSF on trajectory clustering data

0.793 (0.772, 0.816)

0.741 (0.721, 0.76)

0.725 (0.705, 0.744)

Data concatenation

RSF on concatenated data

0.797 (0.778, 0.817)

0.766 (0.745, 0.788)

0.751 (0.725, 0.779)

Joint modeling

JMBayes

Did not converge

  

Last observed values

RSF on Y15 data

0.793 (0.773, 0.812)

0.750 (0.729, 0.77)

0.731 (0.705, 0.76)

Cox on Y15 data

0.778 (0.758, 0.804)

0.75 (0.733, 0.769)

0.728 (0.705, 0.752)

Cox on Y15 data

0.793 (0.772, 0.818)

0.748 (0.73, 0.763)

0.727 (0.707, 0.745)

Reference (Y0 data)

RSF on Y0 data

0.754 (0.73, 0.777)

0.721 (0.698, 0.743)

0.699 (0.672, 0.726)

Cox on Y0 data

0.748 (0.724, 0.773)

0.709 (0.686, 0.73)

0.685 (0.654, 0.716)

LASSO-Cox on Y0 data

0.739 (0.713, 0.768)

0.698 (0.678, 0.717)

0.678 (0.645, 0.711)

  1. The best scores are bolded. iAUC: integrated AUC, LASSO-Cox: Cox Proportional Hazards penalized by LeAst Shrinkage and Selection Operator. JMBayes Joint modeling with Bayesian approach, RSF Random Survival Forest