Skip to main content

Table 6 Observed and predicted frequency of each response profile from each model

From: Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study

  

Expected frequency

 

Response profile

Observed frequency

Model 0

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Model 5

11111

69

49

53

53

63

49

65

11110

6

15

15

15

7

11

4

11101

0

5

6

1

2

6

2

11100

0

1

2

0

1

1

1

11011

9

12

8

13

6

13

7

11010

0

4

2

4

3

3

2

11001

0

1

1

0

1

2

1

11000

1

0

0

0

1

0

1

10111

14

18

14

14

11

19

12

10110

3

5

4

4

5

4

4

10101

0

2

1

6

1

3

1

10100

5

1

0

2

2

1

2

10011

3

4

9

3

4

5

6

10010

0

1

3

1

5

1

4

10001

3

0

1

2

1

1

2

10000

6

0

0

0

6

0

6

01111

35

31

33

33

42

31

35

01110

15

11

11

11

7

18

15

01101

0

3

4

1

1

3

2

01100

5

5

6

5

6

6

8

01011

5

8

5

8

4

4

4

01010

6

5

4

5

5

5

5

01001

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

01000

7

8

9

8

9

5

7

00111

5

12

9

9

8

9

7

00110

18

12

12

12

13

17

17

00101

0

2

2

5

2

2

1

00100

25

29

29

30

29

19

22

00011

7

3

6

3

3

3

3

00010

11

17

19

18

20

14

15

00001

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

00000

60

55

52

52

50

62

58

  1. Observed frequency shown corresponds to five diagnostic test results from 320 patients with suspected melioidosis analysed in Limmathurotsakul et al. Models 0–4 were considered in the original analyses but model 5 is new to this paper