Table 3 Results of ROBIS assessments of 12 included systematic reviews
| Â | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | Â | Â | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Review | 1. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA | 2. IDENTIFICATION AND SELECTION OF STUDIES | 3. DATA COLLECTION AND STUDY APPRAISAL | ||
Author(Date) | Â | Â | Â | ||
Al-Saud (2018) | High risk | High risk | Low risk | ||
Burgess (2019) | High risk | High risk | Low risk | ||
Chmielewska (2017) | High risk | Low risk | Unclear risk | ||
Dai (2021) | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | ||
De Silva (2020) | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | ||
EFSA Panel (2019) | High risk | High risk | Low risk | ||
Ierodiakonou (2016) | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | ||
Larson (2017) | High risk | High risk | High risk | ||
Obbagy (2019) | High risk | High risk | Low risk | ||
Smith (2016) | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | ||
Waidyatillake (2018) | High risk | High risk | Low risk | ||
Yuan (2020) | High risk | High risk | Low risk | ||