|  | Proposed method |  |  |  |  | Wu et al. (2018)’s method |  |  |  |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Par | True | Bias | SSE | SEE | CP | Bias | SSE | SEE | CP |
\(A^{*}\) follows the uniform distribution | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
100 | \(\beta _1\) | 1 | 0.025 | 0.244 | 0.247 | 95.0 | 0.026 | 0.244 | 0.227 | 92.8 |
 | \(\beta _2\) | 1 | 0.027 | 0.391 | 0.398 | 94.9 | 0.027 | 0.391 | 0.368 | 93.6 |
300 | \(\beta _1\) | 1 | 0.011 | 0.129 | 0.133 | 96.0 | 0.012 | 0.129 | 0.130 | 95.2 |
 | \(\beta _2\) | 1 | 0.005 | 0.246 | 0.216 | 94.8 | 0.005 | 0.216 | 0.211 | 95.1 |
500 | \(\beta _1\) | 1 | 0.005 | 0.100 | 0.102 | 95.2 | 0.005 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 95.1 |
 | \(\beta _2\) | 1 | 0.002 | 0.166 | 0.165 | 95.1 | 0.003 | 0.166 | 0.162 | 94.9 |
\(A^{*}\) follows the exponential distribution | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
100 | \(\beta _1\) | 1 | 0.024 | 0.248 | 0.257 | 95.8 | 0.024 | 0.248 | 0.237 | 94.3 |
 | \(\beta _2\) | 1 | 0.015 | 0.398 | 0.416 | 95.7 | 0.015 | 0.398 | 0.383 | 93.6 |
300 | \(\beta _1\) | 1 | 0.003 | 0.134 | 0.138 | 95.6 | 0.003 | 0.134 | 0.135 | 95.3 |
 | \(\beta _2\) | 1 | 0.008 | 0.218 | 0.223 | 95.4 | 0.008 | 0.218 | 0.219 | 95.2 |
500 | \(\beta _1\) | 1 | 0.010 | 0.107 | 0.106 | 94.7 | 0.010 | 0.107 | 0.105 | 95.2 |
 | \(\beta _2\) | 1 | 0.011 | 0.172 | 0.171 | 94.8 | 0.011 | 0.172 | 0.169 | 94.6 |