Skip to main content

Table 1 Table comparing features of MetaBayesDTA, MetaDTA and BayesDTA

From: MetaBayesDTA: codeless Bayesian meta-analysis of test accuracy, with or without a gold standard

 

MetaBayesDTA

MetaDTA

BayesDTA

Bayesian or frequentist

Bayesian

Frequentist

Bayesian

Model assuming gold standard (bivariate model)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

For bivariate - subgroup analysis

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

For bivariate - univariate meta-regression

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

For bivariate - comparative accuracy of 2+ tests

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

Model not assuming perfect gold standard (LCM)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\checkmark\)

For LCM - model multiple reference tests

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

For LCM - subgroup analysis

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

For LCM - univariate meta-regression

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

For LCM - comprehensive assessment of model fit

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

Interactive layout / pop-up menus

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)

Risk of bias and quality assessment on plots

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

Appropriate restrictions in place

\(\checkmark\)

\(\times\)

\(\times\)