Table 5 Agreement and validity estimates from similar method comparison studies
Authors | Device(s) | Comparison | Variable | Subgroup | n | Bias | LoAa | ICC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jaeschke et al. 2015 [40] | Vitus Smart XXL | Manual measurement vs. Bodyscanner (see device) | height | Men | 27 | 0.6 | 1.8 | |
waist | Men | 27 | 1.5 | 5 | ||||
hip | Men | 27 | 2.3 | 2.6 | ||||
height | Women | 32 | 1.2 | 2 | ||||
waist | Women | 32 | 4.7 | 6.6 | ||||
hip | Women | 32 | 3 | 3.6 | ||||
McEneaney & Lennie 2011 [41] | Self- vs. professional measurement / Self-measurement: Written vs. video instructions | waist | Written instructions | 29 | 1.75 | 6.4 | ||
hip | Written | 29 | -0.35 | 7.2 | ||||
waist | Video | 28 | 0.95 | 8 | ||||
hip | Video | 28 | -0.75 | 6.65 | ||||
Dekkers et al. 2008 [42] | Self-reported vs. manual measurement | height | 1298 | -0.7 | 3 | .99 | ||
weight | 1298 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 1 | ||||
waist | 1298 | -1.1 | 7.9 | .96 | ||||
Ross & Wing 2016 [43] | BodyTrace smart scale, BWB-800 | Home scale vs. clinical measurement | weight | 58 | 1.1 | 1.6 | ||
Jensky-Squires et al. 2008 [44] | BioSpace InBody 320 (BIA1), Omron (BIA2), Bod-eComm (NIA), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) | BIA1 vs. DXA | body fat% | Men | 254 | -2 | 6.4 | |
BIA2 vs. DXA | body fat% | Men | 217 | -1 | 8.4 | |||
NIA vs. DXA | body fat% | Men | 252 | -1.8 | 9.4 | |||
BIA1 vs. DXA | body fat% | Women | 254 | -3.6 | 6.6 | |||
BIA2 vs. DXA | body fat% | Women | 217 | -3.3 | 7.8 | |||
NIA vs. DXA | body fat% | Women | 252 | -4.8 | 10.5 | |||
Williams & Bale 1998 [45] | Harpenden skinfold caliper (SKF), BIA 101 (BIA), Hydrostatic weighing (HYD) | HYD vs. BIA | body fat% | female | 115 | -1.2 | 4.9 | |
HYD vs. SKF | body fat% | female | 115 | -1.4 | 4.4 | |||
HYD vs. BIA | body fat% | male | 117 | 0.6 | 4 | |||
HYD vs. SKF | body fat% | male | 117 | 0.1 | 3.7 | |||
Cassidy & Jones 2001 [46] | right-left arm, 1st vs. 2nd measurement | Syst. BP | 237 | 4.77 | 27 | |||
Diast. BP | 237 | 3.73 | 20.6 | |||||
Christofaro et al. 2009 [47] | Omron MX3 Plus vs. Mercury | ICC from first measurement, measurement were taken simultaneously | Syst. BP | 165 | 2.1 | 10.1 | .80 | |
Diast. BP | 165 | 0.8 | 10.3 | .71 | ||||
Agarwal 2016 [48] | Omron HEM 907, Omron HEM 705 CP | Measurement under research vs. clinical conditions | Syst. BP | 275 | -12.7 | 33.4 | ||
Diast. BP | 275 | -12 | 22.1 | |||||
Vera-Cara et al. 2011 [49] | Omron HEM-705-CP | mean of 3 auscultatory vs. mean of 2 oscillometric measurements | Syst. BP | 1084 | 1.80 | 11.9 | ||
Diast. BP | 1084 | -1.60 | 10.8 | |||||
Smith & Hofmeyr 2019 [50] | Contec CMS50D, Nihon Kohden Life Scope MU-631 RK | Fingertip pulse oximeter vs. conventional bedside monitor | Heart rate | 220 | -0.43 | 5.2 | ||
Mitchell et al. 2016 [4] | Polar watch, Android App, iPhone App | Polar vs. android | Heart rate | 111 | -1.75 | 7.5 | .95 | |
Polar vs. iphone | Heart rate | 111 | -1 | 5.9 | .97 | |||
Losa-Iglesias et al. 2016 [28] | Radial pulse (RAD), Nonin GO2 (OXI), Heart Rate Plus (APP) | RAD vs. OXI | Heart rate | 46 | -0.21 | 2.95 | .99 | |
RAD vs. APP | Heart rate | 46 | 3.12 | 5.12 | .95 | |||
OXI vs. APP | Heart rate | 46 | 3.24 | 5.21 | .94 | |||
Liistro et al. 2006 [51] | Vmax 20C, Morgan TLC, Datospir 70, Microloop, Spirobank | Datospir 70 | FVCb | 399 | -0.07 | 0.54 | ||
Microloop | FVCb | 399 | -0.03 | 0.44 | ||||
Spirobank | FVCb | 399 | -0.04 | 0.52 | ||||
Gerbase et al. 2013 [52] | SM 2200 (SM), EasyOne handhelds (EO1-EO3) | EO1 vs. SM | FVCb | 82 | -0.13 | 0.31 | ||
EO2 vs. SM | FVCb | 82 | -0.02 | 0.3 | ||||
EO3 vs. SM | FVCb | 82 | -0.07 | 0.3 | ||||
Wiltshire & Kendrick 1994 [53] | Escort spirometer, Model S wedge bellows spirometer, Wright peak flow meter | Escort vs. Wedge | FVCb | 113 | 0.03 | 0.56 | ||
Escort vs. Wright | PEF | 113 | 0.03 | 1.7 | ||||
Swart et al. 2003 [54] | Spirospec desktop spirometer, Masterlab 4.0 standard spirometer | FVCb | 45 | 0.03 | 0.24 | |||
PEF | 45 | -0.41 | 1.12 | |||||
Rebuck et al. 1996 [55] | Welch-Allyn Pneumocheck, P.K. Morgan Sprioflow 12 | FVCb | 75 | 0.06 | 0.56 | |||
PEF | 75 | 0.44 | 1.9 | |||||
Maree et al. 2001 [56] | Diagnosa, Masterlab 4.0 | FVCb | 45 | -0.1 | 0.22 | |||
PEF | 45 | -0.03 | 1.18 | |||||
Fonseca et al. 2005 [30] | PiKo-1, Spirotel, Mini-Wright, Vitalograph 2120 (reference) | PiKo-1 vs. reference | PEF | 38 | 0.22 | 1.48 | .90 | |
Spirotel vs. reference | PEF | 38 | -0.35 | 1.53 | .95 | |||
Mini-Wright vs. reference | PEF | 38 | -1.15 | 2.9 | .87 |