Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Elmar Braehler |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Widaman |
20 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angelo Picardi |
22 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - frank fincham |
6 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elmar Braehler |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
13 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angelo Picardi |
16 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Widaman |
2 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elmar Braehler |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elmar Braehler |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
20 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Widaman |
3 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elmar Braehler |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
3 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
18 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elmar Braehler |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
18 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
13 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-10-92 |
You can find further information about peer review here.