Skip to main content

Table 4 Validation results using pairwise c-indexes

From: Polytomous diagnosis of ovarian tumors as benign, borderline, primary invasive or metastatic: development and validation of standard and kernel-based risk prediction models

Model

Ben vs Bord

Ben vs PrInv

Ben vs Meta

Bord vs PrInv

Bord vs Meta

PrInv vs Meta

Group 1: logistic regression models

Internal: LR-PC

.82

.95

.93

.88

.96

.73

Temporal: LR-PC

.88

.95

.93

.81

.83

.51

External: LR-PC

.88

.96

.93

.81

.89

.56

Group 2: kernel-based and logistic regression models (based on R1U variable selection)*

Internal: LR-PC2

.86

.94

.92

.88

.96

.73

Temporal: LR-PC2

.90

.94

.92

.81

.83

.51

External: LR-PC2

.91

.95

.93

.81

.89

.56

  1. Models are ranked by the value of the polytomous c-index. Ben: benign; PrInv: primary invasive; Bord: borderline; Meta: metastatic; CI: confidence interval. 95% CIs are computed using the bias-corrected bootstrap method using 1000 bootstrap samples.
  2. * R1U variable selection: variable selection within the framework of least squares support vector machines that is based on rank 1 updates of the kernel matrix [27].