Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Berend Terluin |
27 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ilse Derluyn |
10 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Hyphantis |
1 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Willem Scholte |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Panagiota Goulia |
16 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Berend Terluin |
16 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Hyphantis |
5 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ilse Derluyn |
27 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Willem Scholte |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Berend Terluin |
15 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Willem Scholte |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
16 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-116 |
You can find further information about peer review here.