Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Denise Howel |
6 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Merrick Zwarenstein |
20 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Yudkin |
1 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Shaun Treweek |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Denise Howel |
22 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Yudkin |
23 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Shaun Treweek |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
21 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Shaun Treweek |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
21 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Shaun Treweek |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
21 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
22 Jun 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Jun 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-28 |
You can find further information about peer review here.