Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance results for exposure E, datasets of 1,000 observationsa

From: Outcome-sensitive multiple imputation: a simulation study

  

% miss

A

B

Cb

Db

Eb

Fb

Gb

H

MCAR

Mean biasc

20

−0.019

−0.107

−0.020

−0.025

−0.030

−0.021

−0.023

−0.427

40

−0.038

−0.209

−0.041

−0.045

−0.020

−0.041

−0.045

−0.437

60

−0.084

−0.301

−0.064

−0.056

−0.060

−0.067

−0.055

−0.440

80

0.134

−0.409

−0.109

−0.092

−0.145

−0.126

−0.097

−0.458

Mean errorc

20

0.218

0.208

0.200

0.201

0.199

0.199

0.199

0.430

40

0.290

0.268

0.232

0.231

0.229

0.232

0.233

0.444

60

0.475

0.361

0.306

0.313

0.308

0.309

0.301

0.466

80

1.016

0.503

0.584

0.503

0.543

0.560

0.489

0.525

Coverage

20

0.950

0.941

0.943

0.945

0.949

0.947

0.943

0.489

40

0.962

0.913

0.963

0.957

0.959

0.962

0.949

0.605

60

0.965

0.907

0.959

0.939

0.955

0.960

0.943

0.718

80

0.992

0.957

0.989

0.956

0.986

0.988

0.965

0.823

Power

20

0.720

0.688

0.771

0.761

0.777

0.769

0.770

0.274

40

0.462

0.425

0.604

0.593

0.644

0.610

0.597

0.181

60

0.228

0.213

0.367

0.413

0.394

0.373

0.433

0.163

80

0.065

0.062

0.068

0.180

0.098

0.074

0.169

0.124

MAR

Mean biasc

20

−0.019

−0.125

−0.030

−0.035

−0.030

−0.030

−0.035

−0.425

40

−0.014

−0.227

−0.046

−0.065

−0.044

−0.050

−0.062

−0.441

60

−0.046

−0.308

−0.063

−0.064

−0.049

−0.059

−0.062

−0.446

80

−0.054

−0.350

−0.069

−0.119

−0.080

−0.073

−0.128

−0.408

Mean errorc

20

0.224

0.215

0.200

0.200

0.203

0.198

0.197

0.428

40

0.290

0.282

0.228

0.227

0.234

0.229

0.229

0.448

60

0.491

0.367

0.314

0.312

0.303

0.314

0.305

0.467

80

1.070

0.463

0.593

0.501

0.546

0.601

0.502

0.494

Coverage

20

0.941

0.925

0.955

0.954

0.956

0.955

0.953

0.504

40

0.958

0.896

0.953

0.956

0.950

0.958

0.948

0.561

60

0.955

0.889

0.963

0.948

0.971

0.964

0.946

0.706

80

0.994

0.943

0.978

0.954

0.978

0.978

0.946

0.836

Power

20

0.708

0.678

0.779

0.763

0.771

0.774

0.779

0.271

40

0.448

0.372

0.583

0.564

0.606

0.587

0.593

0.193

60

0.224

0.195

0.350

0.391

0.373

0.360

0.404

0.161

80

0.010

0.052

0.050

0.147

0.077

0.045

0.143

0.123

MNAR

Mean biasc

20

−0.026

−0.150

−0.047

−0.044

−0.054

−0.047

−0.046

−0.425

40

−0.092

−0.302

−0.135

−0.113

−0.097

−0.139

−0.121

−0.454

60

−0.086

−0.334

−0.050

−0.022

−0.027

−0.052

−0.021

−0.450

80

0.038

−0.478

−0.253

−0.283

−0.314

−0.316

−0.275

−0.484

Mean errorc

20

0.227

0.228

0.207

0.207

0.209

0.208

0.207

0.431

40

0.375

0.371

0.302

0.293

0.292

0.304

0.293

0.472

60

0.590

0.411

0.366

0.368

0.361

0.371

0.355

0.479

80

1.283

0.741

0.841

0.737

0.773

0.881

0.711

0.654

Coverage

20

0.954

0.923

0.940

0.945

0.941

0.944

0.943

0.554

40

0.957

0.927

0.958

0.950

0.961

0.954

0.949

0.708

60

0.973

0.962

0.967

0.951

0.964

0.968

0.946

0.746

80

0.997

1.000

0.993

0.990

0.999

0.995

0.986

0.921

Power

20

0.652

0.592

0.714

0.712

0.694

0.706

0.713

0.237

40

0.307

0.223

0.383

0.398

0.420

0.389

0.399

0.153

60

0.209

0.148

0.330

0.368

0.366

0.327

0.382

0.152

80

0.015

0.010

0.041

0.088

0.039

0.030

0.096

0.092

  1. aAnalysis model A: complete case analysis (no multiple imputation [mi]); B: no outcome imputation, not included in mi model; C: no outcome imputation, outcome imputed in mi model; D: outcome imputed and included in mi model; E: outcome imputed and included in mi model but then observations where it was imputed are deleted; F as in C but also including a second correlated outcome in the mi model; G as in D but also including a second correlated outcome in the mi model; H as in D but the mi and analysis models do not include the covariate
  2. bMain models of interest, other models provided for comparison purposes
  3. cReported on log-odds scale and based on a true effect of log [2]