Correction: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?

  • Stuart G Baker1Email author and

    Affiliated with

    • Barnett S Kramer2

      Affiliated with

      BMC Medical Research Methodology20033(Suppl 1):23

      DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-23

      Received: 29 October 2003

      Accepted: 29 October 2003

      Published: 29 October 2003

       

      Dr. Carlos Campillo, Hospital Universitario Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, kindly pointed out that in the paragraph prior to the conclusion, it should read "Figure 3" instead of "Figure 2" and that in the last two sentences of that paragraph, it should read "gram-positive" instead of "gram-negative" [1].

      Authors’ Affiliations

      (1)
      Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute
      (2)
      Offices of Disease Prevention and Medical Applications of Research, National Institutes of Health

      References

      1. Baker SG, Kramer BS: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C? BMC Med Res Methodol 2002, 2:13.View ArticlePubMed
      2. Pre-publication history

        1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2288/​3/​23/​prepub

      Copyright

      © Baker and Kramer 2003

      This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

      Advertisement