Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
24 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathrine Frey Frøslie |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
24 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matthew Gillman |
3 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harold de Valk |
22 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathrine Frey Frøslie |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matthew Gillman |
1 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathrine Frey Frøslie |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
8 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathrine Frey Frøslie |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
8 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
9 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-10-103 |
You can find further information about peer review here.